Page 1003 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 1003

Table 11.1. Substituent Effects on the Stability                     987
                         of Allylic and Benzylic Radical from Calculation
                                 of Radical Stabilization Energy                         SECTION 11.1
                                                                                         Generation and
                                         Relative Stabilization in kcal/mol         Characterization of Free
                                           Allylic a        Benzylic b                       Radicals
                         Substituent  1-position  2-position  p-position
                          H             0          0           0
                                        5 6        4 3         0 3
                          CH 3
                          CN            9 9        3 0         1 4
                          CH=O         11 7       11 6
                          F             8 3       11 0        −0 1
                          HO           12 8       12 6
                          CH 3 O                               0 7
                          H 2 N        13 7        9 4
                           CH 3 
 2 N                          1 8

                         a. AUMP2/6-31G* calculation from M. Lehd and F. Jensen, J. Org.
                           Chem., 56, 884 (1991).
                         b. BLYP/6-31G*  calculations  from  Y.-D.  Wu,  C.-L.  Wong,
                           K. W. K. Chan, G.-Z. Ji, and X.-K. Jang, J. Org. Chem., 61, 746
                           (1996).



          substituents on benzylic radicals, and the results indicate that both donor and acceptor
          substituents are stabilizing. The effects are greatly attenuated in the case of the benzyl
          substituents, owing to the leveling effect of the delocalization in the ring.
              Radicals are particularly strongly stabilized when both an electron-attracting
          and an electron-donating substituent are present at the radical site. This has been
                                                           69
                                68
          called “mero-stabilization” or “capto-dative stabilization,” and results from mutual
          reinforcement of the two substituent effects. 70  The bonding in capto-dative radicals
          can be represented by resonance or Linnett-type structures (see p. 8).
                             :           :
                            Z:          . Z:
                       . C  C       C  C           . C  :  : X  – :C  . : X  +
                          stabilization               stabilization
                          by π-acceptor               by σ-donor

                                                      ox
                                              C
                                          :
                            Z :  :  C :  : Z  –  . :  . . .  x o Z x  o  C o x
                                 .
                              C   X:        C   X: +    C x  X o x
                            combined capto-dative  Linnett double
                            stabilization by σ-donor  quartet structure
                            and π-acceptor substituents

              A comparison of the rotational barriers in allylic radicals A to D provides evidence
          for the stabilizing effect of the capto-dative combination.


           68   R. W. Baldock, P. Hudson, A. R. Katritzky, and F. Soti, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1422 (1974).
           69   H. G. Viehe, R. Merenyi, L. Stella, and Z. Janousek, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 18, 917 (1979).
           70
             R. Sustmann and H.-G. Korth, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 26, 131 (1990).
   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008