Page 963 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 963

Table 10.10. Local Electrophilicity and Fukui Functions for Some Dienes and Dienophiles a  947
          Dienes                        C(1)                    C(4)
                                                                                           TOPIC 10.1
          1          4                              f  −                     f  −      Application of DFT
                                        0.355      0.338       0.355        0.338    Concepts to Reactivity
          CH 2 = CHCH = CH 2
                                                                                     and Regiochemistry of
                                        0.300      0.309       0.282       0.2296
          CH 2 = CHCH = CHCH 3
                                                                                    Cycloaddition Reactions
                                        0.316      0.380       0.354        0.289
          CH 2 =CCH=CH 2

               CH 3
                                        0.277      0.273       0.234        0.277
          CH 2 = CHC = C CH 3   2
                                        0.240      0.217       0.251        0.290
          CH 2 = CHCH = CHOCH 3
                                        0.232      0.264       0.217        0.218
          CH 2 = CHCH = CHOSi CH 3   3
                                        0.240      0.465       0.315        0.212
          CH 2 =CCH=CH 2

               OSi CH 3   3
                                        0.173      0.304       0.230        0.117
          CH 2 = CHCH = CHN CH 3   2
          Dienophiles                   C(1)                    C(2)
          1          2                              f  +                     f  +
                    +  −                1.144      0.357       0.253        0.079
          CH 2 =CH = O −B H 3
                                        1.407      0.499       0.589        0.209
          CH 2 =C CN  2
                                        0.726      0.279       0.200        0.077
          CH 2 =CHNO 2
          CH 2 =CHCH = O                0.685      0.372       0.253        0.137
          CH 2 =CHCN                    0.816      0.469       0.461        0.265
                                        0.579      0.351       0.250        0.152
          CH 2 =CHCOCH 3
                                        0.617      0.409       0.300        0.199
          CH 2 = CHCO 2 CH 3
                                        0.365      0.500       0.365        0.500
          CH 2 =CH 2
          CH≡CH                         0.268      0.500       0.268        0.500
                                        0.183      0.435       0.194        0.463
          CH 2 =CHOCH 3
                                        0.108      0.399       0.119        0.442
          CH 2 =CHN CH 3   2
          a. From L. R. Domigo, M. J. Aurell, P. Perez, and R. Contreras, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 6871 (2002).
          for the cases substituted by methoxy, trimethylsilyloxy, and dimethylamino groups.
          This implies that the unsubstituted terminal carbon will be the most nucleophilic site
          of the diene, which is the same prediction that is made by resonance or FMO treatment
          of terminally substituted butadienes. For dienophiles having EWG substituents, the
                or f  +  parameters can indicate relative electrophilicity. For such dienophiles,
             local
          the  -(unsubstituted)carbon is more electrophilic than the 	-(substituted)carbon, again
          consistent with resonance and FMO conclusions. The local electrophilicity of ethene
          (0.365) is less than for EWG-substituted derivatives, in agreement with its lower
          reactivity as a dienophile.
              In all the cases studied by this approach so far, the diene is the nucleophile and
          the dienophile is the electrophile. For this combination, the dienophile    global   shows
          a correlation with reactivity, whereas comparison of the f  +  between C(1) and C(2)
          gives an indication of the regioselectivity. Dienophiles with EWG substituents have
          higher f  +  at the unsubstituted carbon, in agreement with observed regioselectivity.
          For ERG cases (methoxyethene and dimethylaminoethene) the   value is small and
          the highest f value shifts to the substituted carbon. For the dienes, the position with
                     +
                     –
          the largest f is predicted to be the most nucleophilic. The challenging case of dienes
          with 2-EWG groups (see p. 844) has not yet been addressed by DFT analysis.
              Another DFT-based approach to regioselectivity focused on softness. It has been
          suggested, based on the DFT definitions, that maximum reactivity should occur when
   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968