Page 965 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 965

Equations (10.4) and (10.5) is the fact that the more remote positions (4 and 2 )   949
          change less than the substituted positions. Local softness parameters have also been
          calculated by a bond electronegativity equalization approach. 345  All the computations  TOPIC 10.1
          reported to date refer to diene (HOMO)-dienophile (LUMO) combination pairs, so it  Application of DFT
                                                                                     Concepts to Reactivity
          is not possible to see if this approach successfully predicts the case in which both the  and Regiochemistry of
          diene and the dienophile carry EWG substituents.                          Cycloaddition Reactions
              By comparing the FMO and DFT analyses, we see that most combinations of
          diene and dienophiles lead to the same prediction. The underlying physical basis of
          the predictions is also quite similar. In FMO theory it is the closeness in energy of
          the FMOs that is considered to be the origin of relative reactivity. Regioselectivity is
          attributed to maximum orbital overlap, as judged by the FMO coefficients. In the DFT
          approach, the extent of charge transfer (as measured by the global electrophilicity and
          nucleophilicity parameters) is considered to be the indicator of reactivity and local
          softness is considered to govern regioselectivity. The physical picture of the D-A
          reaction that emerges is one of complementary electronic interactions between the
          diene and dienophile that reduce the electron-electron repulsions that are otherwise
          dominant in the early stages of the reaction. Although both approaches can provide
          predictive relationships for a range of diene-dienophile combinations, neither has yet
          developed quantitative predictions of relative rates over a wide range of reactant
          combinations. This, of course, would be inherently difficult for combinations in which
          steric effects are significant, since neither FMO coefficients nor the DFT parameters
          take account of steric effects directly. It would be interesting to know, however, perhaps
          with cyanoethenes and cyanoethynes, if some combination of the local electrophilicity
          and softness parameters could account for relative reactivity.
              Domingo and co-workers applied the DFT concepts of electrophilicity and
          softness in a study of all the possible cyanoethenes in reaction with cyclopentadiene,
          calculating the TS geometries, energies, and charge transfer at the B3LYP/6-31G ∗
          level. 346  Both gas phase and benzene solution E values were calculated. The geome-
                                                 a
          tries indicated that the TS is slightly earlier in benzene. For symmetrically substituted
          ethenes, the reactions are nearly synchronous, whereas for unsymmetrical dienophiles
          they are asynchronous. The global and local   parameters were determined and the
          local electrophilicity parameter   was found to correlate with the number of cyano
                                      2
          substituents, as would be expected.


            Substitution                   1         f  +  1       2         f  + 2
          1-CN               1.74        0.46       0.266        0.82       0.469
          1,1-diCN           2.82        0.59       0.209        1.41       0.499
          E-1,2-diCN         3.08        0.92       0.300        0.92       0.300
          Z-1,2-diCN         3.01        0.92       0.306        0.92       0.306
          1,1,2-triCN        4.38        1.03       0.236        1.46       0.333
          1,1,2,2-tetraCN    5.96        1.53       0.257        1.53       0.257




              The calculated E decreased with the value of  , whereas the extent of charge
                            a
          transfer at the TS increased.
          345   Y. Cong, Z. Z. Yang, C. S. Wang, X. C. Liu, and Y. H. Bao, Chem. Phys. Lett., 357, 59 (2002).
          346
             L. R. Domingo, M. J. Aurell, P. Perez, and R. Contreras, J. Org. Chem., 68, 3884 (2003).
   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970