Page 999 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 999

There have been many studies aimed at deducing the geometry of radical sites    983
          by examining the stereochemistry of radical reactions. The most direct kind of study
          involves the generation of a radical at a carbon that is a stereogenic center. A planar  SECTION 11.1
          or rapidly inverting radical leads to racemization, whereas a rigid pyramidal structure  Generation and
                                                                                    Characterization of Free
          would lead to product of retained configuration. Some examples of reactions that have  Radicals
          been subjected to this kind of study are shown in Scheme 11.2. In each case racemic
          product is formed, indicating that alkyl radicals do not retain the tetrahedral geometry
          of their precursors.
              Entry 1 is a chlorination at a stereogenic tertiary center and proceeds with
          complete racemization. In Entry 2, a tertiary radical is generated by loss of C≡O,
          again with complete racemization. In Entry 3, an  -methylbenzyl radical is generated
          by a fragmentation and the product is again racemic. Entry 4 involves a benzylic
          bromination by NBS. The chirality of the reactant results from enantiospecific isotopic
          labeling of ethylbenzene. The product, which is formed via an  -methylbenzyl radical
          intermediate, is racemic.
              Cyclic molecules permit deductions about stereochemistry without the necessity
          of using resolved chiral compounds. The stereochemistry of a number of reactions of
                                                       51
          4-substituted cyclohexyl radicals has been investigated. In general, reactions starting
          from pure cis or trans stereoisomers give mixtures of cis and trans products. This
          result indicates that the radical intermediates do not retain the stereochemistry of the
          precursor. Radical reactions involving t-butylcyclohexyl radicals are usually not very
          stereoselective, but some show a preference for formation of the cis product. This has
          been explained in terms of a torsional effect. The pyramidalization of the radical is


             Scheme 11.2. Stereochemistry of Radical Reactions at Stereogenic Carbon Centers

             1 a           CH 3                        CH 3
                                       Cl 2
                 (+)  ClCH 2  C  CH CH 3  hv  (±)  ClCH 2  C  CH CH 3
                                2
                                                            2
                           H    CH 3                  Cl          CH 3
                                            [(CH ) CO]
             2 b  (–)    (CH ) C  C  CH CH 3   Δ 3 3  2  (±)  (CH 3 2  C  CH CH 3
                                                              ) C
                           3 2
                                      2
                                                                        2
                                CH    O                           H
                          CH                   H
              3 c            3
                  (+)  Ph  C  C(CH )       Ph  C  CH 3  +   (CH ) C    O
                                 3 2
                                                               3 2
                          H  OCl               Cl
                                           99% racemic
              4 d     D       N-bromo-       H                 D
                              succinimide
                  Ph  C  CH 3            Ph  C  CH 3   +   Ph  C  CH 3
                      H                      Br                Br
                                              >  99.7% racemic
             a. H. C. Brown, M. S. Kharasch, and T. H. Chao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 62, 3435 (1940).
             b. W. v. E. Doering, M. Farber, M. Sprecher, and K. B. Wiberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, 3000 (1952).
             c. F. D. Greene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81, 2688 (1959); D. B. Denney and W. F. Beach, J. Org. Chem., 24, 108
               (1959).
             d. H. J. Dauben, Jr., and L. L. McCoy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81, 5404 (1959).
           51
             F. R. Jensen, L. H. Gale, and J. E. Rodgers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 5793 (1968).
   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004