Page 598 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 598

World C nema  | 

              in which whole topic areas are cordoned off. Yet the stories Iranian directors tell
              are vivid portraits of a people and their culture, from the extremes of crowded
              cities to dry, desert landscapes.
                Kiarostami’s film, Through the Olive Trees (1994), has suffered a type of distri-
              bution censorship. Although Miramax contracted to distribute the film, it had
              an exceptionally short run in some major U.S. cities. Since then, though Mira-
              max still has the rights to the film, it has been completely unavailable and has
              never released on video or DVD.
                Self censorship and market censorship—adhering to the often rigid aesthetic
              and  economic  necessities  needed  to  get  films  made—are  equally  dangerous
              forms of constraining speech and stifling freedom of expression. The personal
              and cultural interactions so important to world cinema have also been blocked
              by visa denials. In 2002, the United States denied Abbas Kiarostami’s visa after
              he was invited to the New York Film Festival to show his film Ten, a portrait of
              six Iranian women. In protest, Finnish director Aki Kaurismaki refused to at-
              tend the festival even though his film The Man Without a Past was also being
              shown. Kaurismaki said, “As a private citizen of Finland, I accuse the U.S. gov-
              ernment of violating the Geneva Convention. If international cultural exchange
              is prevented, what is left?” The head of the festival, Richard Pena, also stated to
              the press that the denial of Kiarostami’s visa was “unjust, extraordinarily short-
              sighted and a snub to a major Muslim artist.”
                Although Cuban filmmakers work under the eyes of government censors,
              their films contain ample criticism of the socialist revolution they often lov-
              ingly depict. As some writers have observed, many Cuban artists and directors
              have supported censorship because they feel constructive criticism is accepted.
              Making their socialist society better by criticizing the bad and presenting other
              options is one thing, but proposing an end to the revolution, in their eyes is
              another. Cuban cinema has been called nationalistic, but patriotic tendencies
              can be traced through the films of many nations, especially those of the United
              States.
                And as Canadian filmmaker Denys Arcand learned, censorship is not always
              about the failure to express a political opinion, but can also be personal, such as
              when an individual declines to express an emotion. This was the point the direc-
              tor tried to express in his film Barbarian Invasions (2003). In the film, he tried
              to repair his own past through a dialogue between a son and his father. As the
              director, he could make the son say that he loved his father.


                ConCLusion
                By 2007, global cinema had demonstrated its enduring value and essential
              qualities. Three of the five films nominated for an Academy Award for best-
                director were foreign filmmakers (“Oscars Go Global” 2007), and many films
              that won Oscars included international participation. With seven nominations,
              including  best  picture,  Mexican  director  Alejandro  Gonzalez  Inarritu’s  film
              Babel links families on three continents to a tragic event in the African desert.
              Brad Pitt and Australia’s Cate Blanchett were the featured stars, but Mexico’s
   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603