Page 620 - Handbook of Thermal Analysis of Construction Materials
P. 620

588                            Chapter 14 - Sealants and Adhesives


                                     Using thermogravimetry (TG), Hugener and Hean [19]  studied the
                              field aging and laboratory aging-induced changes in four polymer-modified
                              bitumen-based bridge deck sealants. The reference (non-exposed), field,
                              and laboratory-exposed samples were analyzed by TG and other character-
                              izing techniques (e.g., ring and ball softening point, gel permeation chroma-
                              tography). The TG showed only small differences between the reference
                              samples, the field exposed, and laboratory-aged samples. The authors did
                              not provide any TG results because the differences observed were in the
                              same range as the uncertainty of the technique, hence, they considered
                              evaluation of the results unreasonable. The authors did not show any DTG
                              curves, which sometimes better show the changes taking place. Bituminous
                              materials are difficult to analyze by TG due to the different volatility of
                              bitumen components. Paroli, et al., [11][13][15]  studied the weatherability of
                              polyurethane and silicone sealant. By using STA (simultaneous thermal
                              analysis, TG/DTA), they were able to identify the filler level and type in
                              laboratory-cured silicone and polyurethane sealants. They also followed the
                              changes that the sealants underwent after 8,000 hours of accelerated
                              exposure in a xenon-arc Weather-O-Meter.
                                     The DTG curves (Fig. 4) showed that the silicone sealants only
                              underwent minor changes after exposure when compared to the control
                              (unexposed) samples whereas the changes for the polyurethane sealants
                              were more pronounced especially for two of the series, PU1 and PU2. The
                              weight loss in the 200–400°C regions, shown in Fig. 4, was attributed to the
                              polymer decomposition. As can be observed from the DTG curves, the
                              control samples in both PU1 and PU2 display two well-resolved peaks in
                              this region. However, the DTG curves for the exposed samples showed
                              unresolved peaks, regardless of the type of exposure (water or both UV light
                              and water). No attempts were made to interpret the degradation mecha-
                              nism of the changes observed by STA. Paroli and co-workers [13]  also
                              used TG-FTIR to study the induced changes in the chemical composition
                              of the same series of sealants. The IR results supported the changes
                              observed by STA alone. Therefore, it was concluded that this hyphenated
                              technique could be useful in identifying the decomposition products of
                              construction sealants.
                                     In an attempt to correlate aging-induced changes on the mechanical
                              properties (modulus, tensile strength, and elongation at break) of silicone
                              sealants, Lacasse and Paroli [20]  used the same series of sealants. The results
                              from both the mechanical properties and the STA (TG/DTA) showed
                              changes in the silicone sealants. However, the authors were not able to
                              correlate the results obtained from the mechanical test with those from the
                              STA.
   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625