Page 344 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 344

Smart Wells and Techniques for Reservoir Monitoring          287


              •  Chlorides of 10,000ppm, the required water salinity to generate an opti-
                 mum balance for the surfactant injection and reduce its absorption level
                 to the rock.
              •  Water viscosity of 3.5cP, the required viscosity for the polymer cocktail
                 to displace the oil with an appropriate mobility ratio less than 10.0
                 (k ro /μ o   k rw /μ w ).
              •  Surface temperature of around 90°F, the maximum temperature to
                 reduce the polymer degradation.
              Fig. 7.23 also shows chemical sensors setup at the oil and water treatment in
              the separation system. Before the water breakthrough, it is expected
              that produced water from the well formation has original chemical
              levels such as pH of approximately 6.0, chlorides of approximately
              25,000–35,000ppm, viscosity of around 1.0cP, and no emulsions or
              micro-emulsion formed in oils. After breakthrough, it is essential to monitor
              and survey the trend and tendency of pH, ions, chlorides, emulsions, and
              water/oil viscosity through time in producer wells.
                 Chemical sensors and a 3D numerical model coupled with an optimizer
              should be integrated to improve the injection and maximize the oil-
              recovery factor, while reducing ASP costs. A numerical model performs
              calculations on gravity, viscosity, and capillary forces. The injection can
              be adapted and controlled by
              •  Changing the ICV choke size.
              •  Monitoring the chemical propagation into the reservoir using
                 preexisting or observed wells.
              •  Using traditional production behavior, that is, water cut%, GOR, and
                 chemical tracers for ASP and by comparing with chemical sensors shown
                 in Fig. 7.23.
              The optimization process should aim to optimize the required injected pore
              volume (PV) of ASP agents (generally PV can reach a value of 1–2at
              reservoir condition) to maximize the oil production (the barrels of oil per
              $/pound of ASP are incremental) by changing
              •  Optimum size of the chemical slug.
              •  Rate of injection.
              •  Mixed, sequential, or alternated alkaline, surfactant, polymers, or all.


              REFERENCES
              Ajayi, A., Konopczynski, M., 2003. A Dynamic Optimization Technique for Simulation of
                 Multiple-Zone Intelligent Well Systems in a Reservoir Development. SPE-83963-MS.
                 https://doi.org/10.2118/83963-MS.
   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349