Page 278 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 278

THE STUDY OF RELIGION IN       HUSSERL            211

              telos, of  course,  is  the  telos uncovered  by  transcendental  phenomenology,
              a  eutopian  authentic  universal  community  of  monads.
                In  the  context  of  religious  culture  the  entelechy  of  human  culture
              beckons  to  a  higher  form  by  way  of  two  possible  freedom  movements.
              One  is  obvious  for  readers  of  Husserl,  i.e.,  the  development  of  free
              science,  the  liberation  movement  of  logos  in  opposition  to  mythos,
              culminating  in  philosophy.  The  other  is  a  liberation  movement  which
              religion  itself  may  take.  We  will  begin  with  this  latter  first.

                                     II.  Authentic  Religion


              Husserl  claims  that  there  are  conditions  for  the  development  to  the
              higher  form  of  reUgion  which  is  a  religious  liberation  from  religion.
              Husserl  suggests  that  these  conditions  are  cases  where  the  priestly
              mediated  cult  and  teaching  fails  to  provide  either  a  national  or  personal
             sah^ation.  When  much  suffering  is  borne  and  severe  penance  performed
             and  when  nevertheless  salvation  still  seems  remote,  the  formerly  credible
             explanations  of  a  sinful  departure  from  the  divine  ordinances  can  begin
             to  lose  their  power.  And  on  such  occasions  individuals  may  find  occasion
             to  begin  rethinking  their  individual  as  well  as  collective  relationship  to
             God  (Hua  XXVII,  64).
                At  this  juncture {Ibid.^  65)  Husserl  offers  a  very  ambitious  but  concise
             theory  of  the  intentionality  proper  to  what  he  calls  reUgious  culture  and
             its  religious  surmounting.  We  can  get  at  this  by  noting  a  distinction  he
             made  (on  another  occasion,  A  V  21,  22a)  between  how  the  world  or
             milieu  is  pre-given  through  one's  own  individual  and  intersubjective
             experience  and  how  venerable  tradition  co-determines  the  disclosure  of
             these  experienced  objects.  He  seems  to  suggest  that  tradition  is  a
             lamination of  apperceptions  on  top of  the  apperceptions  of  our  individual
             and  intersubjective  experiences.  This  enables  people  of  different  cultures
             to  see  in  one  sense  "the  same  thing"  but  yet  not  see  "it" because  one
             does  not  have  the  "same  world"  as  the  other.^^  He  seems  to  want
             furthermore  to  say  that  there  is  an  individual  and  intersubjective
             apperception  of  values,  upon  which  apperceptions  also  those  of  the
             tradition are  laminated.  This  is a  compUcated  matter  because  for  Husserl
             values  are  founded  on  the  objectifying,  apperceiving  acts  through  which



                  ^^  See  A  V  21,  22a  and  Hua  IX,  497-498;  also  my  discussion  in  §1. of  "From
             Mythos  to  Logos  to  Utopian  poetics:  An  Husserlian  Narrative."
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283