Page 205 - Plant design and economics for chemical engineers
P. 205

COST  ESTIMATION  179

      changes, small design changes, errors in estimation, and other unforeseen
      expenses, which previous estimates have statistically shown to be of a recurring
      nature. This factor may or may not include allowance for escalation. Contin-
      gency factors ranging from 5 to 15 percent of the direct and indirect plant costs
      are commonly used, with 8 percent being considered a fair average value.

      Startup Expense

      After plant construction has been completed, there are quite frequently changes
      that have to be made before the plant can operate at maximum design
      conditions. These changes involve expenditures for materials and equipment
      and result in loss of income while the plant is shut down or is operating at only
      partial capacity. Capital for these startup changes should be part of any capital
      appropriation because they are essential to the success of the venture These
      expenses may be as high as 12 percent of the fixed-capital invest  nt. In
      general, however, an allowance of 8 to 10 percent of the fixed-capital inve
                                                                    4tment
      for this item is satisfactory.
           Startup expense is not necessarily included as part of the required invest-
      ment; so it is not presented as a component in the summarizing Table 26 for
      capital investment at the end of this chapter. In the overall cost analysis, startup
      expense may be represented as a one-time-only expenditure in the first year of
      the plant operation or as part of the total capital investment depending on the
      company  policies.


      Methods for estimating capital investment
      Various methods can be employed for estimating capital investment. The choice
      of any one method depends upon the amount of detailed information available
      and the accuracy desired. Seven methods are outlined in thischapter, with each
      method requiring progressively less detailed information and less preparation
      time. Consequently, the degree of accuracy decreases with each succeeding
      method. A maximum accuracy within approximately f5  percent of the actual
      capital investment can be obtained with method A.

      METHOD A DETAILED-ITEM ESTIMATE.  A detailed-item estimate requires
      careful determination of each individual item shown in Table 1. Equipment and
      material needs are determined from completed drawings and specifications and
      are priced either from current cost data or preferably from firm delivered
      quotations. Estimates of installation costs are determined from accurate labor
      rates, efficiencies, and employee-hour calculations. Accurate estimates of engi-
      neering, drafting, field supervision employee-hours, and field-expenses must be
      detailed in the same manner. Complete site surveys and soil data must be
      available to minimize errors in site development and construction cost esti-
      mates. In fact, in this type of estimate, an attempt is made to firm up as much of
      the estimate as possible by obtaining quotations from vendors and suppliers.
      Because of the extensive data necessary and the large amounts of engineering
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210