Page 168 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 168

SUPERCULTURE  FOR  THE  COMMUNIC ATION  AG E

                               The power of the hybrid
            The superculture is based on the premise that the hybrid – human, material, and
            discursive features of the cultural ‘in between’ (Bhabha 1996) – is the essence
            of  contemporary  cultural  activity.  Cultural  hybrids  are  constructed  through
            routine communication exchange, transforming existing cultural materials and
            signs into more elaborate material and discursive themes and representations,
            then  melding  those  forms  with  other  forms.  Hybrids  are  not  simply  the
            cultural products of everyday interactions; they are the sources and media through
            which such phenomenological interactions take place. Hybrids spring from the
            indeterminate discursive ecologies of the cultural spheres, then connect with
            and  mediate  between  and  among  the  available  cultural  fields,  reinforcing,
            contradicting,  expanding,  and  undermining  previous  understandings  while
            they simultaneously create new cultural frameworks and experiences.
              The  syncretic  creativity  characteristic  of  the  popular  culture  industries
            (think of pop music forms such as country-western, rock en español, jazz fusion,
            or rock-rap, for instance), is now being routinely exercised by everyday cultural
            programmers, a trend that is made possible by widespread availability of the
            latest  communication  technologies  and  the  abundance  of  symbolic  forms
            stimulated by the globalized cultural economy. Culture has always been formed
            through such movements and mergings, but today all this activity takes place
            much faster and on a far broader scale. Contemporary cultural hybrids are then
            further mediated by the production of deterritorialized cultural styles created
            in new physical locations, and by the reintroduction of new cultural syntheses
            back into the ‘original’ locations – for example, Taiwanese culture entering the
            People’s Republic of China, or Mexican-American culture returning to Mexico.


                                Supercultural identities
               ‘Culture counts, and cultural identity is what is most meaningful to
               most people’.
                                                     (Huntington 1996: 20)

            People  all  over  the  world  even  subconsciously  assume  cultural  identities  in
            order to understand their worlds, and try valiantly to create an overall sense of
            well being in the present and hope for the future. That has never been easy to
            do, as the spate of self-help pop psychology books, fundamentalist movements,
            and spiritualist crusades worldwide demonstrates. In some ways, today’s cultural
            conditions appear to only exacerbate the confusion, isolation, and existential
            despair.  As  David  Chaney  has  argued,  the  ‘modern  mass  culture  of  urban-
            industrial  societies’  has  become  in  many  respects  ‘a  culture  of  anonymity’
            (Chaney  1994:  96).  Psychologist  Kenneth  Gergen  believes  that  technology
            greatly  disrupts  cultural  stability,  and  fears  that  the  erosion  of  traditional
            cultures  and  the  onslaught  of  unfamiliar  cultural  messages  will  create  the


                                          157
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173