Page 220 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 220

204  4 Life Cycle Impact Assessment

                    Table 4.4  List of impact categories.

                    Designation according to SETAC Europe 64)
                    (A) Input-related categories (resource depletion or competition)
                       Abiotic resources (deposits, funds and flow)
                       Biotic resources (funds)
                       Land
                    (B) Output-related categories (pollution)
                       Global warming a
                       Depletion of stratospheric ozone
                       Human toxicological impacts
                       Ecotoxicological impacts
                       Photo-oxidant formation
                       Acidification
                       Eutrophication (including BOD and heat)
                       Odour b
                       Noise
                       Radiation
                       Casualties b

                     a Later renamed as ‘climate change’.
                    b Proposed without operationalisation method.


                    safeguard subjects 65)  or areas of protection (AoP) 66)  such as human health, integrity
                    of ecological systems and resources. However, confusion remains since these are
                    also often called end points (or damage categories).
                      From the very beginning, the significance of ‘feasibility’ in the impact assessment
                    has been addressed. 67)  The definition of the number of impact categories and the
                    level of detail of the linkage with potential impacts is a tight-rope walk between the
                    desired scientific accuracy on the one hand and feasibility with limited data and
                    system information on the other hand.
                      From the aspect of precaution it has to be pointed out that such lists always and only
                    correspond to present knowledge and reception (they differ!). In this context it would be
                    useful to consider such a list that was drawn up 20, 40 or 60 a ago.
                      When were individual environmental problem fields acknowledged as such, (i)
                    scientifically and (ii) social-politically? Answers are summarised in Table 4.5. It
                    should be noted that the exact time cannot always be as easily determined as for
                    stratospheric ozone depletion (1974). In this case scientific knowledge and public
                    awareness nearly coincided – a rare case.
                      With the data from Table 4.5 it would be possible to compile a ‘list’ for each
                    decade in the recent past. An average ‘incubation period’ from scientific discovery
                    to public attention of approximately 10 a is discernible. A compilation of avoidable


                    64)  Udo de Haes (1996).
                    65)  Beltrani (1997).
                    66)  Udo de Haes et al. (2002).
                    67)  Kl¨ opffer (1994b).
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225