Page 295 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 295

4.5 Impact Categories, Impact Indicators and Characterisation Factors  279

               strictly speaking, false 322)  assumptions of a linear dose-response relationship for all
               types of toxic impacts. This results in a toxicity factor of approximately 0.5/ED 50
               for every disease endpoint and intake pathway, where ED 50  refers to a daily dose
               causing an effect with a probability of 50% of human life time. Up to four EFs are
               calculated:
               • Cancer by intake exposure
               • No cancer illness by intake exposure
               • Cancer by inhalation exposure
               • No cancer illness by inhalation exposure.
               The human toxicity factors are of dimension comparative toxic units for human
               health (CTU ) or number of diseases/kilgram substance intake. A reference to
                         h
               mass ensures a linkage to released quantities of a substance and to the fU. Since
               calculations can be automated with the help of software and integrated databases,
               the focus shifts towards the inventory, which by then should also include emissions
               of a multitude of organic substances. In the most recent data set, over 3000 organic
               chemicals are included (2500 with freshwater EFs). For ‘metals’ (mostly ionic),
               dissociating organic compounds and amphoteric compounds (e.g. surfactants)
               only interim characterisation factors, 323)  have been determined since their fate
               factors are usually difficult to calculate by multimedia models. 324)
                The toxicological information needed for the determination of the ED -values
                                                                       50
               was taken from extensive data collections, for example, US EPA. The same is valid
               for the physico-chemical data of the compounds necessary for the computation.
                Detailed information necessary for a practical application of this methodology
               can be obtained in the USEtox special issue 325)  including both human toxicity and
               ecotoxicity (next section).

               4.5.3.3  Ecotoxicity

               4.5.3.3.1  Protected Objects  Some problems of the impact category ‘ecotoxic-
               ity’ have already been addressed within the category human toxicity. Protected
               objects in the category ecotoxicity are primarily ecosystems, from small-scale
               ecosystems to the macro ecosystem Earth including the atmosphere (Lovelock’s
               ‘Gaia’). 326) Interdependence between biotic and abiotic factors within the complex
               structure of producers, consumers, decomposers and the physical environment
               is typical of ecosystems. Biotic factors are organisms at various trophic levels.
               Usually primary producers, consumers and destructors are differentiated. From
               dead biomass the destructors generate nutrients which are needed by producers.

               322) A more realistic assumption would make a reference to the functional unit, necessary for LCA,
                  impossible.
               323) Henderson et al. (2011).
               324) Classical multi-media models were developed for non-dissociating organic molecules without a
                  surface-active impact, see Mackay (1991) and Kl¨ opffer (1996b, 2012b).
               325) Jørgensen and Hauschild (2011).
               326) Gaia was the old (pre-olympic) earth goddess and primeval mother, earth itself; Lovelock (1982,
                  1990).
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300