Page 348 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 348

332  5 Life Cycle Interpretation, Reporting and Critical Review

             Frame of an LCA


                                                   Phase 4: Interpretation
                          Phase 1:

                        Goal and scope
                          definition                          Evaluation by:
                                                              - Completeness
                                                              check
                                              Identification of
                                                              - Sensitivity check
                                             significant issues
                          Phase 2:                            - Consistency
                                                              check
                          Inventory                           - Other checks
                          analysis


                          Phase 3:
                                                        Conclusions
                                                         limitations
                           Impact                     recommendations
                         assessment






                    Figure 5.1  Interrelations of constituents in the interpretation and other phases of an LCA
                    (according to ISO 14040).

                      Owing to the iterative approach of LCAs, the evaluation requires some experience.
                    This is taken into account in Supplement B of ISO 14044 ‘Examples for an
                    Interpretation’. It is meant as a support for practitioners to understand how to
                    conduct an interpretation.

                    5.2.3
                    Identification of Significant Issues
                    The standard does not provide prerequisites for materiality thresholds for the
                    identification of significant parameters. Every study therefore needs to articulate,
                    depending on data quality, the significance criteria that are valid. The identifi-
                    cation of significant issues is aimed at identifying result parameters for which
                    a significant quantitative difference, involving data uncertainties, really exists. A
                    careful identification of significant parameters is aimed at preventing over- and
                    misinterpretations.
                      Significant issues can have a varying background. ISO 14044:2006 provides
                    examples of the following in Section 4.5.2.2:
                    • Inventory data
                    • Impact categories
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353