Page 371 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

References 355

SETAC (1993) Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assess- Tukker, A. (2000) Philosophy of science,
ment: A ‘Code of Practice’, 1st edn. From policy sciences and the basis of decision
the SETAC Workshop held at Sesim- support with LCA based on the toxicity
bra, Portugal, 31 March – 3 April 1993, controversy in Sweden and the Nether-
SETAC, Brussels and Pensacola, FL, lands. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 5 (3),
August 1993. 177–186.
SETAC (1991) Fava, J.A., Denison, R., Jones, UBA (1999) Schmitz, S. and Paulini, I.
B., Curran, M.A., Vigon, B., Selke, S., and Bewertung in ¨ Okobilanzen. Methode des
Barnum, J., SETAC Workshop Report: A Umweltbundesamtes zur Normierung von
Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assess- Wirkungsindikatoren, Ordnung (Rangbil-
ments, August 18–23, 1990, Smugglers dung) von Wirkungskategorien und zur
Notch, Vermont, SETAC, Washington, DC Auswertung nach ISO 14042 and 14043.
January 1991. Version ’99. UBA Texte 92/99, Berlin.
SETAC (2008) Jensen, A.A. and Werner, F. and Scholz, R.W. (2002) Ambigu-
Postlethwaite, D. Europe LCA steering ities in decision-oriented life cycle invento-
committee – the early years. Int. J. Life ries. The role of mental models. Int. J. Life
Cycle Assess., 13 (1), 1–6. Cycle Assess., 7 (6), 330–338.