Page 63 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 63

46                                              A. Moltesen and A. Bjørn

            5.3  Sustainability and the Environmental Concern

            Except from the fourth dimension of sustainability, which is typically not consid-
            ered, there is no explicit consideration of environmental conservation in most
            definitions of sustainability. It may therefore seem odd that environmental pro-
            tection is often seen as being more or less synonymous with sustainability. The
            reason should primarily be found in the concern for inter-generational equity. The
            rationale behind protecting the environment from a concern for inter-generational
            equity is that the natural resources and the services that nature provides are seen as
            the foundation for society. Without a functioning environment we will not be able
            to cultivate crops, secure clean air, be protected from ultraviolet radiation from the
            sun, etc. The idea is thus that protecting the environment is necessary to give future
            generations the same possibilities for achieving the levels of welfare that current
            generations are experiencing.
              Thus, besides the concern for intra-generational equity, which is not ensured
            simply by protecting the environment, but which calls for initiatives related to
            combating poverty, sustainability includes a concern for environmental protection.
            The extent to which the environment should be protected as a condition for the
            inter-generational equity dimension of sustainability is, however, not clear-cut.
            Clearly, human needs cannot be met if humans cannot breathe due to air pollution
            or lack of oxygen. But the more detailed dependency of human needs on specific
            functions or qualities of the environment is disputed. For example, will the potential
            for meeting human needs be violated if the panda bear becomes extinct? And to
            what extent can technology replace the services and functions provided by
            ecosystems?
              While keeping this discussion in mind, researchers have attempted to quantify
            carrying capacities of ecosystemsthat must not be exceeded to maintain functions
            and other ecosystem aspects of interest. For example, the carrying capacities of
            different terrestrial ecosystems in Europeand elsewhere towards deposition of
            acidifying compounds (sometimes termed critical loads) have been calculated
            (Hettelingh et al. 2007). At the global scale planetary boundaries have been pro-
            posed and tentatively quantified. Planetary boundaries can be interpreted as car-
            rying capacities for the entire Earth System towards various anthropogenic
            pressures, such as greenhouse gases and interference with nutrient cycles. If
            exceeded there is a substantial risk that the Earth System will change from its
            well-known and relatively stable state that has characterized the Holocene geo-
            logical epoch in the past 12,000 years to an unknown state (Rockström 2009;
            Steffen et al. 2015a). According to estimates, this exceedance has already happened
            for four of the nine proposed planetary boundaries, as shown in Fig. 5.1.
              As this chapter is about the role of LCA in the environmental protection needed
            to achieve sustainability we will only address the part of the sustainability definition
            pertaining to the environment. Chapter 16 addresses the development of what has
            been termed Social LCA, addressing the social dimension of sustainability.
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68