Page 24 -
P. 24

MASTER PLANNING AND TREATMENT PROCESS  SELECTION   2.5

         Rules that  have been finalized provide two levels of standards  to be regulated--primary
         and secondary standards.
           Primary  Drinking  Water  Standards  are  health-related criteria that  require mandatory
         enforcement by the federal USEPA or by  state  primacy agencies. Existing primary stan-
         dards,  as established by rules currently in effect as of January 2003,  are described in Table
         2.1.  It is noted that the table does not address  all established  standards,  but  rather those
         affecting design of the principal physical elements of treatment discussed later in the text.
           Secondary Drinking Water Standards  include criteria that  are intended for control of
         aesthetic factors. Unlike primary standards,  parameters developed as secondary standards
         are  established  as  guidelines that  are  strongly recommended,  but  not required to be en-
         forced. Some of these may be enforced at the discretion of individual state primacy agen-
         cies.  Table  2.2  summarizes  existing  secondary  regulations.  While parameters  governed
         by secondary standards  are not generally health-related, they can have a significant effect
         on customer acceptance and can be a source of considerable customer complaint. Among
        these are water color and tastes  and odors in the drinking water. While the secondary stan-
        dards  are presently observed in drinking water treatment more by customer needs than by
        regulatory control, future findings may result in a switch of some of these constituents to
        primary listing.



        Significant  Future Drinking  Water Regulations  in Progress

        At press  time,  a  number  of new  regulations  were under  development in  various  stages
        from proposed through final promulgation to anticipated effective dates  (Table 2.3).  The
        salient features  of the  more  significant of these  are  as  follows, with  the  anticipated  ef-
        fective dates  shown in parentheses:

        •  Long-Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR-2004)--same re-
          quirements  as  Interim Enhanced  Surface  Water  Treatment  Rule  extended  to  include
          systems  serving under  10,000  people.
        •  Radon Rule (2005)--a limit of 300 pCi/L radon content for systems with a groundwa-
          ter supply--higher limit may prevail with state  multimedia mitigation programs.
        •  Sulfate Rule  (undecided)--still under  USEPA consideration  (may  not  be  included  in
          list of contaminants).
        •  Stage  2  Disinfectants/Disinfection  By-products  Rule  (Stage  2  D/DBPR-2005)--
          compliance based  on  compliance running  average at  individual locations rather  than
          average of all locations.
        •  Long-Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR-2005) for all sur-
          face water  systems  or groundwater under  the  influence--at promulgations  (2004)  re-
          quires  2-year monitoring program  of monthly  samples  for  Cryptosporidium  (systems
          over 10,000 people) or I-year, biweekly E. coli samples (under  10,000).  If results trig-
          ger remediation, measures to attain  up to 2.5-1og improvements may be selected from
          "tool boxes or bins" that may include additional treatment such as ozone or UV or even
          improved watershed protection programs, each measure having individual assigned log
          values.
        •  Ground Water Rule (GWR-2005)--initially will require treatment technology based on
          evaluation of sanitary  survey conducted by primacy agencies. Depending on suscepti-
          bility  of  individual  sources,  up  to  4-log  treatment  inactivation  of  viruses  may  be
          required.
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29