Page 370 -
P. 370

12.28                     CHAPTER TWELVE


         Radioactive Iodine.  Radioactive  iodine  has  a  very high  affinity  for  strong  base  resins
         and  can  be  removed  easily  and  efficiently. In nonradioactive  scenarios,  the  strongly  ba-
         sic resins would be regenerated. In a radioactive scheme, a nonregenerable approach would
         be taken using the same kind of selective resin used for nitrate,  perchlorate,  and uranium.
         This  could be  the better  economic choice depending  on the  water  analysis,  disposal,  and
         resin purchase price costs. Fortunately, in almost all cases, these resins can be interchanged
         in the  same equipment  that,  except for disposal-related  processes,  is a  standard  design.

         Radioactive  Uranium.  The  concentration  in  water  would  likely  be  so  small  and  the
         throughput  capacity of the ion exchange resin so high that a nonregenerable  system is the
         most likely treatment process,  using either ordinary  strongly  basic nitrate  selective resins
         or  recently  developed  specialty  resins  with  even  higher  preference  for  monovalent ions
         like nitrate,  perchlorate,  and  uranium  carbonate.  Throughput  capacities  would be  similar
         or  identical  to  those  of  "ordinary  radioactive"  uranium  removal  for  ordinary  resins  and
         potentially  up  to  several  thousand  times  higher  with  the  latest  developments.  However,
         the  radiation  level in  the  resin  could  become  a  limiting  factor  so that  ordinary  resin,  in
         some cases,  may  well  have  the  same  capacity  as  the  superselective ones  when  operated
         under  limited-dose scenarios.  The biggest difference lies in the added  cost of disposal of
         the spent resin or regenerants  as hazardous/radioactive  wastes.  For radioactive resins, dis-
         posal  costs  are approximately  3 times their purchase  price  (as of March  2003)  for nitrate
         selective anion  exchangers.  Uranium from nuclear wastes,  such  as reactors,  is several or-
         ders of magnitude  more radioactive than  the uranium  loaded into the reactor. The normal
         isotope mix of enriched uranium  is sufficiently low that the workers  who loaded most of
         the original uranium into nuclear reactors wore no protective garments except gloves. That
         was  to  protect  the  fuel  rods  from  human  oil deposits  that  could  later char  and become  a
         corrosion site. The same fuel rods,  when  spent,  could easily kill the worker who tries un-
         loading  it the  same  way  due  to  the  different  isotopes  formed  during  the  nuclear  service
         cycle. Uranium and plutonium are not normally present in wastewater from nuclear plants,
         but  would be  a  problem  if spent  fuel was  stolen  and  used  to make  a  dirty bomb.


         Uranium

         At pH values above 6,  uranium  exists  in potable  water primarily  as  an anionic carbonate
         complex that has a tremendous  affinity for strongly basic anion exchange resins. Strongly
         basic  anion exchange resins  can be used  to remove uranium.  The process  has been tested
         and  found  to  be  very  effective at  pH  of 6  to  8.2.  Higher pH  values  could  result  in  ura-
         nium precipitation,  which  makes  the problem one of physical  removal. Lower pH values
         change  the nature  of uranium  to a  nonionic and/or cationic  species. Tests have shown ef-
         fective removal (over 95%) of uranium  at pH as low as 5.6.  But after the pH was reduced
         to 4.3,  the removal rate  dropped to 50%  and  the run  lengths  (throughput  capacities)  were
         reduced  by  over 90%!  It has  been  shown  that  sudden  changes  in pH  of the  influent wa-
         ter to  values below  5.6  results  in dumping  of previously removed  uranium.  Therefore,  it
         is  important  to  keep  the  inlet water  pH  above  6  at  all  times.  In  situations  where  the  pH
        cannot  be  maintained  above  5.6,  other treatment  methods  should  be considered.

         Throughput  Capacity.  The  uranium  carbonate  complex  has  a  relative  affinity  for
         strongly basic anion exchange resin that is over  100 times greater than  any common ions,
        including  the  divalent  ions  such  as  carbonates  and  sulfates.  At  the  pH  levels associated
        with potable water applications  (6.0 to 9.0),  the carbonate  ion is negligible as it exists pri-
        marily  as  the  bicarbonate  species,  which  is  monovalent.  Therefore,  the  sulfate  ion is the
        only potential  competitor.  The  throughput  capacity  of a  strong  base  anion  resin  for ura-
   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375