Page 116 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 116

Micromechanics Models for Mechanical Properties      105
          and strains computed at a critical point in a yarn to predict the failure load.  The Tsai-
          Wu  (197 1) tensor polynomial criterion may also be used to predict the yarn  strength.
          Failure that occurs in the matrix can be predicted using conventional failure criteria for
          a homogeneous and isotropic material.  Failure that occurs along the interface between
          two  yarns  may  be  predicted  using  those  failure  criteria  for  predicting  interlaminar
          delamination in composite laminates.
             Tan et al (2000a,b) investigated the failure of  the 3D orthogonal woven composite
          specimen in tensile loading.  They carried out a full 3D finite element analysis of a unit
          cell for the 3D orthogonal woven composite by modelling yarns as a homogeneous and
          orthotropic property and matrix as being isotropic.  Maximum stress criterion and the
          rule  of  mixture  were  employed  to  predict  the  tensile  strengths  in  both  in-plane
          directions, i.e., the stuffer yarn and weft yarn directions.  A good correlation was noted
          for the tensile strength in the direction of the stuffer yarns.  Due to waviness of the weft
          or filler yarns (see Figure 4.23a), there is a remarkable difference between the measured
          and predicted strength.  Tan et al. (2001) also investigated the mechanical properties
          and  failure mechanisms of  3D orthogonal woven E-glass/epoxy composite  materials.
          Their results show that  there  is a reasonably good  correlation between  the  measured
          tensile strengths  and  those predicted  using  the rule  of  mixture.  Callus  et  a1  (1999)
          performed  tensile  tests  of  glass  fibre  reinforced  polymer  composites  with  3D
          orthogonal, normal layered interlock, and offset layered interlock woven architectures.

















                                    <----*---  -x
               path after                                I ?Yam   path prior to loading

                                                              Spring model for elastic
                          z l





          Figure 4.23 (a) micrograph of cross-section showing waviness of  filler yarns, and (b)
          Schematic of the curved beam model (Tan et al, 2000a; Tong et al, 2002)


          To  take  into  account  the  yarn  waviness  in  strength  prediction,  Tong  et  a1  (2002)
          modelled each individual weft yarns between any two adjacent stuffer yarns as a beam
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121