Page 102 - A Comprehensive Guide to Solar Energy Systems
P. 102

Chapter 5 • Sustainable Solar Energy Collection and Storage  97



                 Table 5.2  Globally Installed Stationary Energy Storage Capacity by Battery Type, 2016
                                                          Installed Capacity
                 Battery Technology                  (/MW)                   (/GW h)
                 Li-ion                              ∼1300                   1.27
                 High temperature NaNiCl             171                     1.01
                 Valve regulated lead-acid (VRLA)    196                     0.173
                 Vanadium redox-flow batteries (VRFB)  114                   412


                 Table 5.3  Comparative Costs of Commercially Available Batteries in South Africa
                 Over 20-year Lifetime of System
                 Battery             Cost/€(A h) −1      No. Replacements    Total Cost/€
                 VRLA                1.38                4                   1726
                 LFYP                14.21               1                   7104
                 Aquion              6.72                2                   5040
                 LFYP, Lithium-iron-yttrium-phosphate battery; VRLA, valve regulated lead acid battery.
                 5.7  Carbon Footprint and Lifecycle Impact Considerations

                 A comparison of carbon footprints of lead-acid and different types of  li-ion battery
                   production for the system is given in Fig. 5.11 (equivalent data for Aquion batteries is
                   unavailable at the time of writing). When the need for replacement batteries is consid-
                 ered, lead-acid batteries account for a greater contribution to the carbon footprint of
                 the  system than li-ion alternatives, other than lithium titanate batteries (lTO). lithium-
                 nickel-cobalt-aluminium batteries (NCA) would contribute least to the carbon footprint
                 of the system over its lifetime. Using recovered materials in battery manufacturing could
                 significantly reduce emissions associated with production.
                   Carbon footprint of batteries production is useful for a comparison of global  warming
                 potential. However, this is a limited picture of the environmental impacts of batteries.
                 Further consideration of emissions during production from primary resources should be
                 made; for example, the production of li-ion batteries from primary raw materials results
                 in considerable SO 2  emissions and water contamination.
                   Consideration of the hazardous nature of materials within batteries and their potential
                 impacts if improperly managed during use and end-of-life is also important. Issues relating
                 to end-of-life of li-ion batteries arise primarily from their metal content: Cobalt is present
                 in cathodic materials and electrodes are made with the extremely reactive alkali metal li. In
                 addition, F, As, and sulfonated compounds are present in electrolytes. Improper  treatment
                 of lead-acid batteries at end-of-life results in the release of lead and sulfuric acid to the
                   environment. These materials can directly impact human health through contamination
                 of water and soil, and accumulate in food chains when batteries are landfilled or recycled
                 improperly [39]. This is of particular concern for rural SSA, where batteries are installed in
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107