Page 161 - A Course in Linear Algebra with Applications
P. 161

5.3:  Operations  with  Subspaces           145


             To  verify  this,  suppose  we had  chosen  different  represen-
        tatives,  say v'  for  v +  17 and w'  for  w +  U.  Then  v'  =  v +  Ui
        and  w'  =  w  +  u 2  where  ui, u 2  £  U.  Therefore

                v'  +  w'  =  (v +  w)  +  (ui  +  u 2 )  e  (v +  w)  +  U,


                  7
        so that  (v  +  w')  +  U  =  (v +  w)  +  U.  Also cv'  =  cv  +  cu ±  <E
        (cu)  +  U  and  hence  cv' +  U  =  cv + U.  These  arguments  show
        that  our  definitions  are  free  from  dependency  on the  choice  of
        coset  representatives.

        Theorem     5.3.5
        If  U  is  a subspace  of a vector  space V  over  a field F,  then  V/U
        is  a  vector  space  over  F  where  sum  and  scalar  multiplication
        are  defined  above:  also  the  zero  vector  is  0 +  U  =  U  and  the
        negative  of v  +  U  is  (—v)  +  U.
        Proof
        We  have to  check that  the  vector  space  axioms  hold  for  V/U,
        which  is an  entirely  routine  task.  As an  example,  let  us  verify
        one  of  the  distributive  laws.  Let  v, w  G  V  and  let  c  E  F.
        Then  by  definition


          c((v  +  U)  +  (w  +  U))  =  c((v  +  w)  +  U) = c(v +  w)  +  U
                                                    =  (cv +  cw)  +  U,

        which by definition  equals  (cv+U)  + (cw+U).  This  establishes
        the  distributive  law.  Verification  of the  other  axioms  is  left  to
        the  reader  as an  exercise.  It  also  is easy to  check that  0  is the
        zero  vector  and  (—v)  +  U the  negative  ofv  +  U.
        Example     5.3.8

        Suppose  we take  U to be the  zero subspace  of the vector  space
        V:  then  V/0  consists  of  all  v  +  0 =  {v}, i.e., the  one-element
        subsets  of  V.  While  V/0  is  not  the  same  vector  space  as  V,
        the  two  spaces  are  clearly  very  much  alike:  this  can  be  made
        precise  by  saying that  they  are  isomorphic  (see  6.3).
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166