Page 18 - Accelerating out of the Great Recession
P. 18

INTRODUCTION


           Recessions separate winners from losers. While overall profit
        levels fall within an industry, there can be great variation in
        profit performance from company to company. Markets consol-
        idate as outperformers strengthen their positions, and default
        rates spike upward as underperformers drop out. In general,
        larger companies outperform the others, but some small players
        can leapfrog their weakened competitors and claim a top-three
        spot in their particular industry.
           Most important, companies that outperform in a recession
        tend to enjoy a sustained advantage. They tend to retain their
        performance leadership in subsequent years—in terms of both
        revenue and share price. Indeed, an index of stock prices, base-
        lined to 1932 (the trough year of the Great Depression), shows
        that the average stock price appreciation of the top performers
        over the subsequent five years was 34 percent greater than the
        average performance of other companies.
           The real question, therefore, is what drives a winning per-
        formance in a downturn and the following upswing?
           To find some answers to this question, we have dug deeply
        into the history of past recessions, particularly the Great
        Depression and Japan’s Lost Decade, to learn from the compa-
        nies that fundamentally improved their competitive positions
        even during those turbulent times. As you will see, we cite these
        stories throughout this book and devote Chapter 3 to an analy-
        sis of the U.S. auto industry in the 1930s. (For a description of
        our research and how we chose the companies that we cite, see
        Appendix A at the end of the book.)
           In addition to this research, we conducted two surveys of
        senior managers in large corporations. The first survey, com-
        pleted in March 2009, focused on the priorities companies had
        set for themselves to deal with the rapidly deteriorating eco-



                                 ■  xvii  ■
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23