Page 197 - Accelerating out of the Great Recession
P. 197

APPENDIX B


        making their plans based on estimates of gross domestic prod-
        uct (GDP) growth that were higher (often significantly) than
        official forecasts at the time. Only 57 percent saw a threat of
        economic protectionism and increased government regulation.
        Even for those who expected shifts in government and con-
        sumer behavior, their business expectations were not consistent
        with those beliefs. Of the 71 percent who expected consumers
        to become more price sensitive in 2009, over a third were also
        planning to increase prices in 2009 in response to their own ris-
        ing costs.
           By September, it became clear that companies were taking
        better account of the impact of the recession. As markets picked
        up from March 2009 onward, the survey respondents were able
        to better assess the effect of the downturn on their businesses
        and also to better comprehend the trends in the external envi-
        ronment. This has led them to a better understanding of the
        macroeconomic and business climates.
           Forecasts for GDP growth in September were more closely
        aligned with International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates,
        and roughly 90 percent of the respondents said that they were
        planning for a U- or an L-shaped recession. Seventy-five per-
        cent of respondents polled in September believed that trade
        protectionism would increase, compared with 57 percent in
        March. Reflecting the public debate in their countries, this fig-
        ure was higher (more than 80 percent) for trade-deficit coun-
        tries such as the United States, France, Spain, and Italy, and sig-
        nificantly lower (roughly 65 percent) in trade-surplus countries
        such as Germany and Japan. A similar percentage of respon-
        dents also expected to see more policies oriented toward the
        rebalancing of global trade, as well as the introduction of higher
        levels of financial and labor protectionism.



                                 ■  176  ■
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202