Page 329 - Accounting Best Practices
P. 329

c15.qxd  7/31/03  3:27 PM  Page 318
                                                                  Internal Auditing Best Practices
                            318
                            nal auditing departments to groom new managers for senior-level positions. This
                            is an excellent approach, for not only does it give auditors a wide-ranging view of
                            company operations, but it also allows the managers of functions being audited to
                            see them and to provide feedback to the human resources department regarding
                            the wisdom of promoting them to more senior positions. Another problem is that
                            outside auditors will sometimes assign junior staff personnel to internal audits,
                            which allows them to charge less per hour. However, these junior personnel fre-
                            quently have less experience than the internal auditors, and no experience with
                            specific details of company operations, making them doubly inefficient. Conse-
                            quently, one must carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of this
                            approach before handing over the internal audit department to a supplier.

                                    Cost:                 Installation time:


                            15–13 SCHEDULE SOME INTERNAL AUDITS
                                   ON A JUST-IN-TIME BASIS
                            A very common management practice is to create a schedule of all internal audits
                            to be performed for the upcoming year. This allows the audit manager to arrange
                            for meetings with local managers well in advance, as well as to determine the
                            logistics of shifting auditors around the world to various company locations. It is
                            also a common measurement tool, whereby the audit manager commits to com-
                            pleting a certain number of audits; subsequently, finishing all work listed on the
                            annual schedule is used as the baseline measure of success. Unfortunately, block-
                            ing out the entire audit staff’s time for a year in advance also leaves no room for
                            audits that are requested on short notice, which typically arises when an emer-
                            gency with control issues arises. Addressing these needs calls for a substantial
                            reshuffling of the audit schedule.
                                A fine alternative is to schedule only a portion of the internal audit team’s time,
                            perhaps two-thirds, leaving the remaining time slots open. By doing so, any short-
                            term work requests can be dealt with promptly. Not only does this give company
                            managers the impression that the internal audit department is more responsive to
                            their needs, but it also eliminates the need for sudden schedule changes. The only
                            problem with this approach is that one can no longer determine the success of the
                            internal audit department based on its ability to complete a planned set of audits.
                                    Cost:                 Installation time:



                            15–14 SCHEDULE INTERNAL AUDITS BASED ON RISK

                            The scheduling of various areas within a company for internal audits is usually an
                            arcane process, involving pressure from the audit committee to have a few “pet”
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334