Page 24 - Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids
P. 24

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION















        1.1.  Cross-section of a hypothetical porous grain showing various types of pores: closed (C),
    blind (B), through 0, interconnected (I), together with some roughness (R) (Rouquerol, 1990).

    Table 1.3. In addition to closed pores  and open pores, we may distinguish between
    blind pores  (or dead-end pores) and interconnected pores. Pores which are  open at
    both sides of a membrane or porous plug are termed through pores.
     Porosity is usually &fmed  as the ratio of the volume of pores and voids to the
    volume occupied by the solid. However, it should be kept in mind that the recorded
    value of porosity is not always a simple characteristic property of the material, since
    it is likely to depend also on the methods used to assess both the pore volume and the
    volume of  the solid. The pore volume is usually regarded as the volume of  open
    pores, but it may include the volume of closed pores. Moreover, the recorded value
    may depend on the nature of the probe molecule or the experimental conditions.
     It is not always easy to distinguish between roughness and porosity or between
    pores and voids. In principle, a convenient and simple convention is to refer to a solid
    as porous only if the surface irregularities are deeper than they are wide. Furthermore,
    the area of a rough surface is regarded as an external surface area, whereas the area of
    the pore walls is the internal surface area. We prefer to regard the porosity as an intrin-
    sic property of the material and to designate void as the space between particles, which
    is dependent on the conditions of packing (and the particle coordination number).
     It is evident that the description of many real porous materials is complicated by a
    wide distribution of pore size and shape and the complexity of the pore network. To
    facilitate the application of certain theoretical principles the shape is often assumed
    to be cylindrical, but this is rarely an accurate portrayal of the real system. With some
    materials, it is  more  realistic to  picture the pores as slits or  interstices between
    spheroidal particles. Computer simulation and the application of percolation theory
    have made it possible to study the effects of connectivity and tortuosity.
     Pore structures can be created in a number of different ways. intracrystalline pores
    are an inherent part of certain crystalline structures, e.g. of zeolites and certain clays.
    These pores are generally of molecular dimensions and are arranged as highly regular
   networks. A second type of porous material is composed of an assemblage of small
   particles (as mentioned earlier). The pore structure of the consolidated system (e.g. a
   xerogel) is mainly dependent on the size and packing density of the primary particles:
   the  process  is  therefore constitutive. A  third  route  is  subtractive  since  inherent
   Parts  of  the  original  structure are  removed  to  create  the  pores, e.g.  the  thermal
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29