Page 285 - Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids
P. 285

CHAPTER 9. ADSORPTION BY ACTlVE CARBONS

                  Table 93.  EEective pore sizes of activated carbons
                  Carbon     Effective pore volume,   Pore range, w (nm)
                              vn(mic) (an3 g-')






                  'For propam.
                   For nitm~en.
                  U, ul~cropomus; S, supermicropomus.


     pore size or volume (Rouquerol et al., 1994) and also specify the adsorptive and
     operational temperature.


     9.53.  Adsorption of helium
     Helium is often used in adsorption manometry for the determination of  the 'dead
     space' volume (see Chapter 31, but this procedure is based on the presupposition that
     the gas is not adsorbed at ambient temperature and that it does not penetrate into
     regions of the adsorbent structure which are inaccessible to the adsorptive molecules.
     In fact, with some microporous adsorbents, significant amounts of helium adsorption
     can be detected at temperatures well above the normal boiling point (4.2 K). For this
     reason,  the  apparent density  (or so-called  'true  density')  determined  by  helium
     pycnometry  (Rouquerol et  al.,  1994) is  sometimes dependent on the operational
     temperature and pressure (Fulconis, 1996).
       Because of its small size (collision diameter = 0.20 rim), helium would appear to
     be a useful probe molecule for the study of ultramicroporous carbons. The experi-
     mental  difficulty  of  working  at  liquid helium  temperature (4.2 K)  is  the  main
     reason why helium has not  been  widely used  for the characterization of  porous
     adsorbents. In addition, since helium has some unusual physical properties, it is to
     be  expected  that  its  adsorptive behaviour  will  be  abnormal and  dependent  on
     quantum effects.
       Ln their  recent  investigations  of  helium  adsorption  by  microporous  carbons,
     Kaneko and his co-workers (Kuwabara et al., 1991; Setoyama et al., 1993; Setoyama
     and Kaneko,  1995; Setoyama er  al., 1996) have obtained strong evidence that the
     density of physisorbed helium is not the same as that of bulk liquid helium at 4.2 K
     (i.e. 0.102 g cm").  By adopting the value 0.202 g ~rn-~, which had been proposed on
     theoretical grounds by Steele (1956), Kaneko and his co-workers were able to obtain
     fairly good agreement between the corresponding uptakes of  He  and N,  by  certain
     microporous carbons - as indicated in Figure 9.23. With some other porous carbons,
     the presence of narrow ultramicropores was demonstrated by  the much larger appar-
     ent pore volumes available for helium adsorption.
       The shapes of a series of helium and nitrogen isotherms are compared in Figures
     9.24 and 9.25. To facilitate comparison, the amount adsorbed is expressed in the form
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290