Page 155 - Adsorption, Ion Exchange & Catalysis- 2007, Elsevier - Copy
P. 155

Else_AIEC-INGLE_cH003.qxd  7/13/2006  1:45 PM  Page 151
                  3.6 T w o-Phase Fix ed Beds                       151


                    The equation proposed by K ubo   et al  . (1983) can be used for 10     Re  /     2000
                                                                                 p
                  w mode): (experiments took place in upflo

                                             Pe   0.243       0.27    Re  0.27      (3.315)
                                               p             p
                  For ceramic rasching rings of diameters between 10 and 60 mm, Bennett and Goodridge
                  wing correlation: (1970) proposed the follo

                                                Pe    Re 0.1    0.51                (3.316)
                                                  p      p

                  It should be noted here that particles of irregular shape result in higher degrees of axial dis-
                  persion and thus lower Peclet numbers.
                    Gas–solid fixed beds:  For axial dispersion in gas–solid fixed beds, the
                  Edwards–Richardson correlation can be used (W 1975;  en and F an,  Andrigo   et al  ., 1999).

                                           1       0.5       0.75

                                          Pe  p  1 9.5       Re Sc  p               (3.317)
                                                     Re Sc
                                                        p
                  This correlation has been tested on many experimental data and it is valid for 0.08 <   Re
                                                                                         p
                    400 and 0.28     Sc    2.2.
                    For gases, Hiby proposed the following correlation for 0.04 <   Re  < 400 and random
                                                                          p
                  beds of spheres (Gunn, 1968):
                                          1       0.65        0.67

                                         Pe               0.5  Re Sc
                                           p                    p                   (3.318)
                                               17       
                                                    Re Sc  p  

                  In Figure 3.36, the Edw ards–Richardson and Hiby correlations are compared for gas–solid
                  systems, while in Figure 3.37, the Edwards–Richardson and Kubo correlations are com-
                  pared for gas–solid and liquid–solid systems, respecti . ely v
                    From Figure 3.37, it is clear that the Peclet number is greater in gas–solid systems, and
                  thus the flow is closer to plug flow for the same Reynolds number .

                  Radial Mixing  Radial dispersion can be viewed as a result of stream slitting and side-
                  stepping. A stream of fluid at a particular radial position strikes a solid particle in its axial
                  journey and is split into two by the collision. On a half the stream moes laterally erage, v  v
                  to the right and the other to the left. This is happens repeatedly and the result is that the
                  original single stream is laterally dispersed toard the w all. w
                  The particle Peclet number is defined as (Carberry 1976) ,

                                                       ud  p
                                                  Pe  p                             (3.319)
                                                       D  R
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160