Page 102 - Advanced Design Examples of Seismic Retrofit of Structures
P. 102

94   Advanced Design Examples of Seismic Retrofit of Structures




















            FIG. 2.47 An example of poststressing of masonry walls. (Permission from Cintec.)


               The vertical and diagonal bracing improves the lateral in-plane resistance of
            the retrofitted wall by a factor of 4.5 [35]. As the results of Somi’s tests shows
            [38], the improvement in the lateral resistance was limited by crushing of the
            masonry at ends (toes) followed by vertical strips’ global buckling. Examples
            of using external reinforcement are shown in Fig. 2.47.


            2.8.3.8 Using Center-Core Rods
            The center-core system consists of a reinforced, grouted core placed in the cen-
            ter of an existing URM wall. A continuous vertical hole is drilled from the top of
            the wall into its basement wall. The core achieved by this oil-well drilling tech-
            nique may be 50–125mm in diameter, depending on the thickness of the URM
            wall and the retrofitting required. With existing technology, this core can be
            drilled precisely through the entire height of a two- or three-story masonry wall.
            The drilling is a dry process, with the debris removal handled by a vacuum and
            filter system that keeps the dust to a minimum. After placing the reinforcement
            in the center of the hole, a filler material is pumped from the top of the wall to
            the bottom so that the core is filled from the bottom under pressure controlled by
            the height of the grout.
               Shear tests by Plecnik et al. [39] show that specimens made with cement
            grout were generally 30% weaker than specimens made with sand/epoxy or
            sand/polyester grouts. This technique is successfully used to double the resis-
            tance of URM wall in a static cyclic test. Although a high lateral displacement
            was achieved during the test, the energy dissipated was limited. The tensile
            yield of the bar did not occur due to the bar anchorage problem. However,
            the system has several advantages: it will not alter the appearance of the wall’s
            surface, and the function of the building will not be impaired since the drilling
            and reinforcing operation can be done externally from the roof. The main dis-
            advantage to this technique is that it tends to create zones with widely varying
            stiffness and strength properties.
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107