Page 121 - Advanced Linear Algebra
P. 121

The Isomorphism Theorems   105



            as being in B²= Á > ³ . Using these identifications, we do have equality in the
            finite-dimensional case.


            Theorem 3.18 Let   and  >   be finite-dimensional and let    ²   =  Á  >B  ³  . If we
                            =
            identify  =  ii  with  =   and  >  ii  with  >   using the natural  maps,  then    dd   is
            identified with  .

                                                                        %
            Proof. For any %=   let the corresponding element of =  ii  be denoted by   and
            similarly for  >  . Then before making any identifications, we have for    #  =  ,

                           dd ²#³² ³ ~     d ²     #´    ³µ ~ #²  ³ ~  ² #³ ~ #² ³
            for all   >  *  and so

                                       dd ²#³ ~ #  >  ii
            Therefore, using the canonical identifications for both  =  ii  and  >  ii  we have
                                          dd ²#³ ~ #

            for all #=  .…
            The next result describes the kernel and image of the operator adjoint.


            Theorem 3.19 Let  ²= Á > ³ . Then

                               B
            1) ker ²  d  ³   ~  im ³    ²
            2)im ²  d ³   ~  ² ker  ³
                         )
            Proof. For part 1 ,
                            ker ²  d  ³   ~  ¸       >  i  “  d  ²      ³  ~     ¹
                                            i

                                   ~ ¸   > “  ² = ³ ~ ¸ ¹¹
                                            i
                                   ~ ¸   > “  ²im ² ³³ ~ ¸ ¹¹

                                   ~   ² im  ³
                      )
            For part 2 , if   ~   ~    d      im²    d  ³ ,  then  ker ² ³ ‹ ker ² ³   and  so



              ker ² ³ .


            For the reverse inclusion, let    ker ² ³ ‹ =  i  . We wish to show that

                                      i

             ~    d    ~    for some     > . On  2 ~ ker ² ³, there is no problem since

            and     d     ~     agree on 2  for any   > i  . Let   be a complement of ker ²    . ³
                                                    :

                             8
                                             :
            Then   maps a basis  ~¸  “  0¹  for   to a linearly independent set

                                     8 ~¸     “  0¹

            in  >   and so we can define       >  i  on  8  by setting
                                        ²   ³ ~

            and extending to all of  >  . Then  ~        ~     d      on   and therefore on  . Thus,
                                                                      :
                                                      8
             ~    d     im ²    d  ³.…
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126