Page 28 - Advanced Linear Algebra
P. 28

12    Advanced Linear Algebra



            Theorem 0.10 (Zorn's lemma )  If   is a partially ordered set in which every
                                         7
                                      7
            chain has an upper bound, then   has a maximal element.…
            We will use Zorn's lemma to prove that every vector space has a basis. Zorn's
            lemma is equivalent to the famous axiom of choice. As such, it is not subject to
            proof from the other axioms of ordinary (ZF) set theory. Zorn's lemma has many
            important equivalancies, one of which  is  the  well-ordering principle .  A  well
            ordering on a nonempty set   is a total order on   with the property that every
                                   ?
                                                    ?
            nonempty subset of   has a least element.
                            ?
            Theorem 0.11  (Well-ordering principle )  Every nonempty set has a well
            ordering.…
            Cardinality

            Two sets   and   have the same cardinality , written
                         ;
                   :
                                              ;
                                        ((:~  ( (
                                     (
                                                             )
            if there is a bijective function  a one-to-one correspondence  between the sets.
            The reader is probably aware of the fact that
                                        o
                                                    o
                                  ( ( ~  {  (( and  ( ( ~  r  ((
            where  o    denotes  the  natural numbers,   the integers and  r  {   the rational
            numbers.
            If   is in one-to-one correspondence with a subset  of  , we write  :  ;  ((    ( ( . If
              :
                                                                        ;
                                                             ; is in one-to-one correspondence with a proper
            :                                        subset of   but not all of  ,
                                                                           ;
            then we write ((:  ( ( . The second condition is necessary, since, for instance,
                             ;
            o                                              { is in one-to-one correspondence with a proper subset of   and yet   is also in
                                                                   o
                                      {
            one-to-one correspondence with   itself. Hence,  o  (( ~  ( {  . (
            This is not the place to enter into a detailed discussion of cardinal numbers. The
            intention here is that the  cardinality  of  a set, whatever that is, represents the
            “size” of the set. It is actually easier to talk about two sets having the same, or
                                                                          )
            different, size  cardinality  than it is to explicitly define the size  cardinality  of
                                                                (
                                 )
                        (
            a given set.
            Be that as it may, we associate to each set   a cardinal number, denoted by  :  ((
                                               :
            or  card²:³ , that is intended  to  measure  the size of the set. Actually, cardinal
            numbers are just very special types of sets. However, we can simply think of
            them as vague amorphous objects that measure the size of sets.
            Definition
            1   A set is finite  if it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with a set of the
             )
               form {   ~ ¸ Á  Á Ã Á   c  ¹ , for some nonnegative integer  . A set that is
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33