Page 229 - Advances in Forensic Applications of Mass Spectrometry - Jehuda Yinon
P. 229

1522_book.fm  Page 202  Thursday, November 13, 2003  9:58 AM









                             5.2 Analysis of Ignitable Liquids in Fire Debris and the
                                  Role of GC/MS/MS


                             Dale Sutherland

                             5.2.1  Introduction
                             Black hole, copious amounts of water, thunderstorm, hot spell, decisions, deci-
                             sions…
                                Finally, you are able to investigate, take notes, observe burn patterns, get
                             circumstantial evidence, and obtain samples from the fire scene. But are these
                             samples truly negative or does this field of forensic science lack the capability
                             to handle these highly weathered, more difficult samples? In spite of burn
                             patterns, multiple areas of origin, K9 or other sample locators, etc., these
                             now older samples often return from the forensic laboratory with negative
                             results. This scenario has been seen more than once by many investigators.
                                As a rule, samples of debris that remain after any fire are very complex
                             as they contain large quantities of a wide variety of burnt material. These
                             samples obtained by investigators may be turned over directly for laboratory
                             analysis or may be stored for long periods of time awaiting other case infor-
                             mation that may lead to a decision to have the samples analyzed. The analysis
                             of the burnt material or fire debris can be very complex due to the large
                             number of organic compounds present that represents the natural compo-
                             nents of the material, compounds (called pyrolysates) made through expo-
                             sure to heat and combustion, as well as potential ignitable liquid residues
                             that may or may not have been used to accelerate a fire. No two fire debris
                             samples are identical. The detailed analysis of fire debris samples requires the
                             skill and knowledge of a scientist that is focused on the challenges and
                             objectives in this field of trace evidence analysis. There are few tests available
                             that can review and compare such a large number of characteristic targeted
                             organic compounds and/or organic class profiles to ultimately determine
                             whether a sample is “positive,” meaning that the sample contains residues of
                             an ignitable liquid, or “negative.” The ignitable liquid characteristics are often
                             in very small amounts relative to the presence of large quantities of pyroly-
                             sates. The most common samples contain materials such as wood, plastics,
                             and polymers, which have a wide range of diversity without considering the
                             potential number of pyrolysates developed from their combustion.
                                Aside from the following brief statements, this chapter will not dwell on
                                                                                    1
                             the history of the analysis, which is readily available elsewhere.  This chapter
                             will focus on the latest advancements and strategies in fire debris analysis
                             today. For many years the analysis of fire debris has been conducted by the
                             extraction of the organic components from the fire debris sample, followed
                             by compound separation with gas chromatography and detection by a uni-

                             © 2004 by CRC Press LLC
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234