Page 208 - Advances in Textile Biotechnology

Enzymatic treatment of wool and silk fi bres 189

gulrajani m l, gupta s v, gupta a and suri m (1996), ‘Degumming of silk with dif-
ferent protease enzymes’, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 21(December), 270–275.
heine e (1991), Grundlegende untersuchungen zur einwirkung von enzymen auf
wolle, PhD Thesis, Technischen Hochschule Aachen.
heine e and höcker h (1995), ‘Enzyme treatments for wool and cotton’, Rev Prog
Color, 25, 57–63.
heine e and höcker h (2001), ‘Bioprocessing for smart textiles and clothing’, in Tao
X, Smart fibres, fabrics and clothing, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, UK.

pp. 254–263.
heine e, hollfelder b, shen j and bishop d (2000) ‘Parameters affecting the mor-
phology of wool during enzyme treatment’, The 10th International Wool Textile
Research Conference, 26th Nov–1st Dec, Aachen, Germany.
holme i (2006), ‘New frontiers in wool dyeing and fi nishing’, Int Dyer, 191(10),
9–11.
hossain k h m g, juan a r and tzanov t (2008), ‘Simultaneous protease and trans-
glutaminase treatment for shrink resistance of wool’, Biocatal Biotransform,
26(5), 405–411.
iwto roadmap (2009), 100% natural renewable sustainable wool, change to a health-
ier and safer environment, International Wool Textile Organisation, Brussels,
Belgium.
jovancic p, jocic d and dumic j (1998), ‘The efficiency of an enzyme treatment in

reducing wool shrinkage’, J Text Inst, 89 Part 1, No.2, 390–400.
jovancic p, jocic d, molina r, julia m r and erra p (2003), ‘The combined low-
temperature plasma/enzyme wool shrink-resist treatment’, AATCC Rev, 3(2),
25–28.

julie m r, erra p, dominguez j g and infante m r (1985), ‘The influence of a cationic
surfactant on the shrink-resist treatment of wool with sodium sulphite in aqueous
solution’, J Soc Dyers Color, 101(February), 66–71.
kholiya r, khambra k, rose n and sangwan n (2008), ‘Optimization of process
conditions for cellulase enzyme treatment of woollen fabric’, Colourage, January,
65–68.
komatsu k (1979), ‘Chemistry and structure of silk’, Japan Agric Res Quart, 13(1),
64–72.
konishi t, kondo m and kurokawa m (1967), ‘Study on the structure of silk fi broin
under enzymatic hydrolysis’, Sen-i Gakkaishi, 23, 64–69.
krasowski a, muller b, fohles j and hocker h (1999), ‘Degumming of silk in an
ultrasonic fi eld’, Melliand Textilberichte, 80, 543–545.
leeder j d and rippon j a (1985), ‘Changes induced in the properties of wool by

specific epicuticle modifi cation’, J Soc Dyers Color, 101, 11–16.
lefevre t, rousseau m and pezolet m (2007), ‘Protein secondary structure and
orientation in silk as revealed by Raman spectromicroscopy’, Biophys J, 92, 2885–
2895.
lenting h b m, broekman h, guebitz g m, kokol v and shen j (2009), ‘Industrial

production of enzyme-modified wool fibers for machine-washable bed coverings’,
Biotechnol J, 4, 1–9.
lenting h b m, schroeder m, gübitz g m, cavaco-paulo a, and shen j (2005),
‘A new enzyme technology based method for obtaining machine washable
wool’, The 11th International Wool Textile Research Conference, 4th–9th Sep,
Leeds, UK.

© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2010