Page 143 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 143

AN INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

            news, editorial responsibility for the selection of ‘soundbites’
            broadcast, and the interpretation placed upon them, is seen to belong
            with the journalist. When Margaret Thatcher appeared on the BBC’s
            live Jimmy Young Radio Show (as she frequently did during her time
            in office) the things she said were inevitably perceived rather
            differently than if she had addressed television viewers within the
            context of a party political broadcast. Such messages are ‘less
            manufactured’ than advertisements and, as such, may be thought to
            carry more legitimacy and credibility. Even if such a conversation is
            light-hearted and avoids politics entirely, the audience may still feel
            that a ‘truer’ picture of the politician emerges. The lack of control
            and apparent spontaneity of most free-media scenarios heightens
            ‘believability’.
              This quality of free media is a double-edged sword, however. To
            the extent that a politician’s appearance on a news or discussion
            programme is genuinely outside his or her editorial control, the scope
            for mistakes (from the politician’s perspective) is clear. Broadcast
            interviews can be hostile as well as deferential. Misjudgments can be
            made about the impact of a political event once it has passed into
            the hands of the media, as happened famously with the Labour Party’s
            Sheffield rally during the 1992 election campaign (see p. 136 ). When
            in 1983 Margaret Thatcher was questioned by a well-prepared viewer
            on live national television about the sinking of the Belgrano she
            revealed to millions of viewers an unpleasantly arrogant side of her
            personality.
              The advantage of free media exposure for politicians is founded
            on the awareness of the audience that such appearances are ‘live’, or
            if not live in the technical sense, something more than a manufactured
            political advertisement. And the audience knows this because
            politicians frequently slip up, or encounter hostile opposition and
            criticism when they enter the free media arena.
              Politicians, therefore, while desiring media exposure of this more
            ‘authentic’ kind, also strive to reimpose some kind of control over
            the output, and to achieve this requires that politicians employ
            professionals skilled in the workings of the media.



                    POLITICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS: A BRIEF
                                    HISTORY

            As the media’s heightened role in the conduct of political discourse
            became apparent, the twentieth century witnessed the birth and rapid

                                       126
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148