Page 190 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 190

PRESSURE GROUP POLITICS

              They add that terrorism is ‘violence for effect. It is theatre. It is
            crime and it is politics. This three-fold confluence of real life-and-
            death spectacle, high politics and base crime fits so well into what
            the Western media is conditioned to cover that they cannot resist
            giving it full exposure’ (Ibid., p.76).
              Like all the other forms of political communication discussed in
            this book, terrorism can only have significance as a communicative
            act if it is transmitted through the mass media to an audience. Unless
            it is reported, the terrorist act has no social meaning. David Paletz
            observes that ‘terrorists seek publicity to bring about their
            psychological goals…they use violence to produce various
            psychological effects—demoralising their enemies, demonstrating
            their movement’s strength, gaining public sympathy, and creating
            fear and chaos. To succeed in these goals, terrorists must publicise
            their actions’ (Paletz and Schmid, 1992, p.2). Pickard notes that
            terrorist acts ‘have been strategically used to help turn the public’s
            attention towards problems that aggrieved groups wish to have
            attention focussed upon’ (1989, p.21).
              In addition to the general aim of generating publicity for a
            political objective terrorist acts may be intended to fulfil a number
            of more specific purposes (Gerritts, 1992). They may, for example,
            be organised in such a way as to demonstrate the vulnerability of
            the state. The assassination by the Irish National Liberation Army
            (INLA) in 1978 of Lord Mountbatten was such an act, as was the
            bombing of the Conservative Party conference in Brighton in 1984
            by the Irish Republican Army, and that same organisation’s 1991
            mortar attack on the Cabinet as it met in Downing Street. The
            casualties and narrow escapes occasioned by these acts were
            symbolic reminders to the British people of the reach of groups
            who were, according to the official line, unrepresentative criminal
            thugs.
              Terrorist groups may use these acts to communicate to their own
            supporters. In the aforementioned examples of Irish republican
            terrorism, one may argue that non-republicans in Britain, including
            those with a dislike and even hatred for the then Conservative
            government, would not have welcomed the death and destruction
            caused by, for example, the Brighton bomb. To their own
            supporters, however, the IRA were attacking a legitimate target,
            with a professionalism and devastating impact which would
            certainly have enhanced their status within their own community.
            Related to this, terrorist acts may be used to signify the ‘heroism’ of
            the perpetrators. The suicide bombings carried out by Hezbollah in

                                       173
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195