Page 30 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 30

POLITICS IN THE AGE OF MEDIATION

              This is true of both print and broadcast media, in all capitalist
            societies. Some ‘biases’ may be attributed, as Chapter 4 shows, to
            constraints and limitations on the newsgathering process. Others are
            the product of choices made to support this or that political party or
            idea. Newspapers in Britain and most other capitalist societies are
            relatively open about which political parties they support (though
            some seek to maintain the appearance of neutrality). Broadcasters
            are generally more reticent, although, in many political debates, such
            as those which have occupied the UK media around such issues as
            industrial relations and the future of Northern Ireland, clear
            preferences have been on display. 2
              While the extent and direction of media bias will vary in a modern
            democracy, the fact that it exists entitles us to view the media
            organisations as important actors in the political process. Between
            the sending of a political message and its reception by an audience,
            something happens to it. It gets altered in various ways, consciously
            or as a consequence of the media production process, so that its
            meaning and hence impact on an audience may change.
              The media—and the print media in particular—are important
            to the political process in more direct ways. While analysts may
            argue about the bias of reportage, all newspapers take pride in
            their ‘public voice’  —the editorials in which they articulate political
                            3
            opinions. Sometimes these are presented as the ‘voice of the reader’,
            and directed at policy-makers. Alternatively, they may be
            constructed as the calm, authoritative voice of the editor, viewing
            the political scene from a detached distance. In both cases, the
            editorial is intended as a political intervention, and often read as
            such by a government or a party. Commentaries, analyses, and other
            forms of ‘authored’ journalism are also interventionist in intention.
            Chapter 5 will consider how the journalists’ messages interact with
            the political process as a whole.
              The media are important in the political process, finally, as
            transmitters of messages from citizens to their political leaders. In
            their coverage of opinion polls, for example, the media may claim to
            represent ‘public opinion’, which takes on the status of a real thing
            by which to understand or evaluate the political situation, often in
            terms critical of or admonitory to individual politicians. In this way,
            the views of the citizen are communicated upwards, often with
            observable effects on parties’ behaviour. Newspapers also publish
            readers’ letters, providing a forum for public discussion of political
            issues. In some newspapers, notably The Times, the letters page is
            likely to be read by politicians as indicative of public opinion (or

                                       13
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35