Page 67 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 67

AN INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

              The public service duopoly, comprising by 1982 four channels
            (BBC1, BBC2, ITV and Channel 4) lasted until the late 1980s, when
            the flowering of cable and satellite technologies, reinforced by the
            Conservative government’s policy of broadcasting deregulation,
            began to erode it. By 1999 British viewers already had access to
            dozens of television channels, most of them financed by subscription
            revenues and advertising. With the introduction of digital TV in
            1998, Britain was well on the way to becoming what America had
            already been for many years: a multi-channel broadcasting
            environment.
              Unlike the press, British broadcasting has always been subject to
            close regulation, both by legal means and through regulatory bodies
            such as the Independent Television Commission, the Broadcasting
            Standards Commission, and the Broadcasting Complaints
            Commission. These monitor the performance of the broadcasters to
            ensure that it is consistent with public service criteria such as good
            taste, diversity and, of particular relevance to the present discussion,
            political impartiality.
              The 1990 Broadcasting Act requires broadcasters to observe ‘due
            impartiality’ in their coverage of political issues, ensuring ‘adequate
            or appropriate’ balance during and between election campaigns, for
            party and non-party political actors (McNair, 1999). This requirement
            does not extend to political organisations which, like the Provisional
            IRA and loyalist paramilitaries in Northern Ireland before the
            conclusion of the 1998 Good Friday peace agreement, adopt
            unconstitutional campaigning methods.


                         DEMOCRACY AND THE MEDIA

            We have already referred in general terms to the important role
            assigned the media by liberal democratic theory. As Nimmo and
            Combs put it, ‘historically, the mass media were heralded as the
            ultimate instruments of democracy… [They] were destined to unite,
            educate, and, as a result, improve the actions and decisions of the
            polity’ (1992, p.xv). Of broadcasting, Scannell and Cardiff observe
            that the BBC’s role, from its very earliest years, was to create ‘an
            informed and reasoning public opinion as an essential part of the
            political process in a mass democratic society’ (1991, p.8).
              The media’s democratic role would be fulfilled, on the one hand,
            by journalists’ adherence to the professional ethic of objectivity in
            reporting the facts of public affairs. Objectivity implied a clear

                                       50
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72