Page 147 - Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design
P. 147

140                                     Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design

         For designers and manufacturers, it would:

         l  improve target market selection decision,
         l  facilitate communication with retailers and consumers,
         l  enable better quality control, and
         l  improve communication/relations with subcontractors.
         For government, trade associations, and academicians:
         l  for academicians, it would offer a common sizing and fit research language,
         l  for trade associations, it would improve communications with members and reduce legal/
            quasi-legal problems, and
         l  for governments, it would facilitate consumer education, facilitate relations with the indus-
            try, and enable possible links with other areas of concern (i.e., population fitness and eating
            habits).


         References


         Alder, K., 2002. The Measure of All Things; The Seven-Year Odyssey That Transformed the
             World. Abacus, London.
         Ashdown, S.P., 1998. An investigation of the structure of sizing systems: a comparison of three
             multidimensional optimized sizing systems generated from anthropometric data with the
             ASTM standard D5585-94. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 10 (5), 324–341.
         Beazley, A., 1997. Size and fit: procedures in undertaking a survey of body measurements.
             J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2 (1), 55–85.
         Bernier, B., Davignon, M.-F., Saint-Martin, J., 2003. Sur la piste : G  eographie, histoire et

               education a ` la recherche de la citoyennet  e. Editions du Renouveau p  edagogique inc.,
             Bibliothe `que nationale du Qu  ebec et Bibliothe `que nationale du Canada.
         Bryk, N.V., 1988. American Dress Pattern Catalogs 1873–1909. Dover, New York.
         Burns, L.D., Bryant, N.O., 2002. The Business of Fashion Designing, Manufacturing and
             Marketing. Fairchild Publications, New York.
         Chun-Yoon, J., Jasper, C.R., 1996. Key dimensions of women’s ready-to-wear apparel: devel-
             oping a consumer size-labelling system. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 14 (1), 89–95.
         United States Department of Commerce Office of Technical Services (USDCOTS), 1958. Com-
             mercial Standard CS215-58 Body Measurements for the Sizing of Women’s Patterns and
             Apparel, a Recorded Voluntary Standard of the Trade. United States Government Printing
             Office, Washington, DC.
         Cooklin, G., 1990. Pattern Grading for Women’s Clothes, the Technology of Sizing. Blackwell
             Publishing Professional Books, London.
         Fan, J., Yu, W., Hunter, L., 2004. Clothing Appearance and Fit: Science and Technology.
             Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge.
         Faust, M.-E., Carrier, S., 2009. Women’s wear sizing: a new labeling system. J. Fash. Mark.
             Manag. 14 (1), 88–126.
         Goldsberry, E., Shim, S., Reich, N., 1996a. Women 55 years and older. Part I. Current body
             measurements as contrasted to the PS 42-70 data. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 14 (2), 108–120.
         Goldsberry, E., Shim, S., Reich, N., 1996b. Women 55 years and older. Part II. Overall satis-
             faction and dissatisfaction with the fit of ready-to-wear. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 14 (2),
             121–132.
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152