Page 138 -
P. 138

8 Optimal Transportation and Monge–Ampère Equations
                                                                                                     133

           theorem can be regarded as a nonlinear version of the Helmholtz decomposition
           theorem, which additively decomposes a smooth vector field into a divergence
           free vector field, tangential to the boundary of the domain, and a gradient
           map. It turns out, by using a dual formulation by Kantorovich of the Monge
           problem (which is a continuous version of linear programming) that the optimal
           transportation map is the gradient of a convex potential, i.e.

                            S opt (x) = grad V(x),  V convex on X .         (8.11)

              Since (8.1) implies (after a weak formulation using test functions), assuming
           sufficient smoothness of S:


                                 g S(x) det DS(x) = f (x),                  (8.12)
           we conclude that V is a (weak) solution to the following Monge–Ampère equa-
           tion:
                                             2
                               g(grad V)det(D V) = f (x), x ∈ X             (8.13)
                                       grad V : X → Y
             2
           (D V stands for the Hessian of V). This links the Monge–Kantorovich mass
           transportationtheorytotheareaofpartialdifferentialequations.Weremarkthat
           the Monge–Ampère equation is a fully nonlinear elliptic differential equation,
           which has only recently been investigated in a detailed mathematical way. In
                                                       4
           particular we refer to the work of Luis Caffarelli [6], [7], [8], which presents
           adeepregularitytheoryfortheMonge–Ampèreequation,basicallygivingresults
           analogous to the Schauder theory for linear elliptic equations. Note that even
           the interpretation of the equation (8.13) is not obvious since convex functions
                                                                           2
           in general do not have pointwise second derivatives, in full generality D V is –
           due to convexity of V – a matrix of signed measures only!
              The solution of the Monge–Kantorovich optimisation problem is even more
           complicated if the cost function s = s(|x − y|) is not uniformy convex, e.g. in the
           original case of Monge (8.3). Here we only mention that, again under the above
           assumptions on the measures f and g, the optimal transportation map exists
           and satisfies:

                                 S opt (x) = x − a(x)grad u(x) ,            (8.14)

           where u is again a scalar potential with |grad u(x)| = 1and a is nonnegative. We
           referto[9] on howtorecover u and the distance a from the measures f and g.
              Obviously, for more complex realistic applications the cost functional has to
           be adapted, in particular when there are (geometrical or other) constraints on
           the transportation trajectories. Heuristically speaking, the Monge–Kantorovich
           problem corresponds to the case where all possible transportation roads exist
           4
             http://rene.ma.utexas.edu/users/caffarel/
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143