Page 212 - Applied Photovoltaics
P. 212

x  increasing costs of transmission and distribution (owing, for instance, to
                                 equipment and labour price escalations, new requirements for underground
                                 construction etc.)
                              x  increasing difficulty in acquiring rights-of-way for transmission lines and
                                 sites for substations, owing to environmental, electromagnetic field or other
                                 concerns
                              x  possibility of changes to regulations, subsidies, taxation regimes etc., which
                                 currently favour fossil fuel intensive energy systems.

                          10.6.4 Example 1—Distribution Feeder 1103, Kerman, California
                          Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), a major Californian utility, has investigated the
                          relevance of distributed photovoltaic systems in their network. A small sub-section,
                          the ‘Kerman Feeder 1103’ has been analysed in some detail (Shugar, 1990) to
                          evaluate the electrical impact and economics of connecting in a 500 kW p  photovoltaic
                          array. The 500 kW p Kerman substation began commercial operation in June 1993
                          (Wenger et al., 1994), after construction at a cost of $US12.34/W p (modules
                          US$9/W p  and BOS US$3.34/W p ) (Solar Flare, 1993). Of this cost, US$1.14/W p  was
                          attributed to the experimental nature of the system.
                          Fig. 10.8 showed the feeder load and the Kerman single-axis tracking PV array output
                          throughout the day of peak load in 1993–94 (Wenger, 1994). The peak is significantly
                          reduced and transformer temperature reduced by 4°C at the peak time by reduced
                          heating earlier in the day.
                          Fig. 10.10 shows the monthly PV energy output and its performance index (actual
                          energy production divided by expected energy production) for the Kerman PV grid
                          support system. The poor performance index in some months is attributed to inverter
                          failures (Wenger, 1994).



























                                 Figure 10.10. Kerman Feeder 1103, monthly  PV energy  production and
                                 performance index (©1994 IEEE, adapted from Wenger et al.).




                                                                                                199
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217