Page 185 - Applied Probability
P. 185

9. Descent Graph Methods
                              170
                              9.2 Review of Discrete-Time Markov Chains
                              For the sake of simplicity, we will only consider chains with a finite state
                              space [6, 11]. The movement of such a chain from epoch (or generation) to
                              epoch is governed by its transition probability matrix P =(p ij ). If Z n
                              denotes the state of the chain at epoch n, then p ij =Pr(Z n = j | Z n−1 = i).
                              As a consequence, every entry of P satisfies p ij ≥ 0, and every row of P

                              satisfies   p ij = 1. Implicit in the definition of p ij is the fact that the
                                        j
                              future of the chain is determined by its present without regard to its past.
                              This Markovian property is expressed formally by the equation
                               Pr(Z n = i n | Z n−1 = i n−1 ,...,Z 0 = i 0 )=Pr(Z n = i n | Z n−1 = i n−1).
                                                                (n)
                                The n-step transition probability p  =Pr(Z n = j | Z 0 = i)isgiven
                                                                ij
                                                                                  n
                              by the entry in row i and column j of the matrix power P . This follows
                              because the decomposition
                                                 (n)
                                                p ij  =     ···   p ii 1  ··· p i n−1 j
                                                          i 1  i n−1
                              over all paths i → i 1 →· · · i  n−1 → j corresponds to matrix multipli-
                              cation. A question of fundamental theoretical importance is whether the
                                             n
                              matrix powers P converge. If the chain eventually forgets its starting state,
                              then the limit should have identical rows. Denoting the common limiting
                              row by π, we deduce that π = πP from the calculation
                                                      π
                                                     
                                                      .              n+1
                                                      .
                                                     .   =   lim P
                                                              n→∞
                                                      π

                                                           =     lim P n  P
                                                                n→∞
                                                                 π
                                                               
                                                                 .
                                                           =   .   P.
                                                                 .
                                                                 π
                              Any probability distribution π on the states of the chain satisfying the
                              condition π = πP is termed an equilibrium or stationary distribution
                              of the chain. For finite-state chains, equilibrium distributions always exist
                              [6, 11]. The real issue is uniqueness.
                                Mathematicians have attacked the uniqueness problem by defining ap-
                              propriate ergodic conditions. For a finite-state chain, two ergodic assump-
                              tions are invoked. The first is aperiodicity; this means that the greatest
                                                              (n)
                              common divisor of the set {n ≥ 1: p ii  > 0} is 1 for every state i. Aperiod-
                              icity trivially holds when p ii > 0 for all i. The second ergodic assumption
                              is irreducibility; this means that for every pair of states (i, j) there exists
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190