Page 25 - Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything
P. 25

12    Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything


                                                 13
             Chapter 10, written by Shu-Heng Chen, poses this question: “Would
          IOET Make Economics More Neoclassical or More Behavioral? Richard
          Thaler’s Prediction, A Revisit.” Shu-HengChen is at the National Chengchi
          University in Taipei, Taiwan, where he is a Distinguished Professor in its
          Department of Economics, Director of its AI-ECON Research Center,
          and its Vice President. He is Editor-in-Chief (Economics) of the journal of
          New Mathematics and Natural Computationand the Journal of Economic Interaction
          and Coordination; he is an Editor at Economia Politica, the Global and Local
          Economic Review, and the International Journal of Financial Engineering and Risk
          Management; and he is an Associate Editor for Computational Economics and for
          Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review. The author for this chapter
          approaches IoE by providing a thoughtful study of what it means economi-
          cally. In his view as an economist, the fundamental question pursued by
          economists todayistheimpact ofIoEonthetheory ofhoweconomicsworks,
          that is, namely how rational individual humans are from the perspective of
          economic theory or from the perspective of the history of economic analysis.
          Tothisend,forIoE,theauthorexaminesindividualhumaneconomicbehav-
          ior based on the earlier era of conventional economic theory and from the
          more modern individual human economic behavior as IoE dawns. The com-
          parison that he draws motivates economists and readers as he sketches the
          future of individual behavior in economic theory. For IoE, the Nobel Lau-
          reate Richard Thaler would have proposed two possibilities two decades ago
          hinging on this branching point: Homo economicus, as human individuals
          are depicted in neoclassical economics, and Homo sapiens, as humans are
          articulated in behavioral economics. Thaler was not aware of IoE. Despite
          this lack of an awareness of IoE, Thaler would have predicted that behavioral
          economics, the latter, would be the trend that we would observe as the IoE
          develops and becomes central in our economic lives. In this chapter, on the
          macro and micro levels, even with arguments presented for both sides, and
          depending on whether collective intelligence raises or lowers, the author
          addresses his prediction based on Thaler’s work for the coming age of IoE.
          He addresses the following two possibilities, namely, trend reversal and trend
          sustaining. He concludes with a warning that recurring social problems can
          be aggravated depending on the road that humans take to either check (free
          markets)ornotcheck(socialism)thedecisionsthattheymake,along-running
          argument that continues (e.g., Gilder, 1981/2012). The author offers a pan-
          oramic view of human behavior with IoE. He sees no easy answers but


          13
            Corresponding author: chen.shuheng@gmail.com.
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30