Page 34 - Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything
P. 34

Uncertainty Quantification in Internet of Battlefield Things  21


              architectures become necessary to ensure their applicability, particularly in
              the context of ML applications. To help illustrate these challenges, a moti-
              vating scenario is provided.



              2.2.1 Detecting Vehicle-Borne IEDs in Urban Environments
              As part of an ongoing counterinsurgency operation by coalition forces in the
              country of Aragon, focus is placed on monitoring of insurgent movements
              and activities. Vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs) have
              become more frequently used by insurgents in recent months, requiring
              methods for quick detection and interception. Recent intelligence reports
              have provided details on the physical appearance of IED-outfitted vehicles
              in the area. However, due to the time constraints in confirming detections of
              VBIEDs, methods for autonomous detection become desirable. To support
              VBIED detection, an IoBT infrastructure has been deployed by coalition
              forces consisting of a mix of unattended ground sensors (UGSs) and
              unmanned aerial systems (UASs). In turn, supervised learning methods
              are employed over sensor data gathered from both sources.
                 Recent intelligence has indicated that VBIEDs may be used in a city
              square during the annual Aragonian Independence Festival. A local custom
              for this festival involves decoration of vehicles with varying articles (includ-
              ing flags and Christmas tree lighting). A UAS drone is tasked with patrolling
              the airspace over one of the inbound roadways and recoding images of
              detected vehicles. However, due to the decorations present on many civilian
              vehicles, confidence in VBIED classification by the UAS is significantly
              reduced. To mitigate this, the drone flies along a 3-mile stretch of road
              for 10 minutes to gather new images of the decorated vehicles. In each case
              the drone generates a classification of each vehicle as VBIED or not, each
              with a particular confidence value. For low-confidence readings, the drone
              contacts a corresponding UGS to do the following: (i) take a high-resolution
              image, and (ii) take readings for presence of explosives-related chemicals in
              the air nearby, where any detectable explosives confirms the vehicle is a
              VBIED. Since battery power for the UGS is limited, along with available
              network bandwidth, the UAS should only request UGS readings when
              especially necessary. Following receipt of data from a UGS, the UAS per-
              forms retraining of the classifier to improve the accuracy of future VBIED
              classification attempts. Over a short period, the UAS has gathered additional
              training data to support detection of VBIEDs. Eventually, the drone passes
              over a 1-mile stretch of road lacking UGSs. At this point the UAS must clas-
              sify detected vehicles without UGS support (Fig. 2.1).
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39