Page 140 - Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS)
P. 140

CURRENT ISSUES    125



          for example, may not be present on a local database because the burglar was
          never arrested in that locale. There may be a record in an adjoining state, with
          multiple entries, but the adjoining database cannot be searched because it oper-
          ates with software from another vendor, the input structure is different, or there
          is no agreement allowing one state to search the other’s database. Ideally, a
          latent print examiner should be able to search a hierarchy of databases from
          the local database, to the state, to IAFIS, and onto other states as necessary. And
          the process for those searches, while internally different as the searches move
          through different systems, should appear similar to the examiner. That does
          not happen in the current environment.


          6.1.2.2 Lack of Integration at the Federal Level
          Many people believe that agencies of the federal government such as the FBI
          and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rely on either one AFIS
          system or at least AFIS systems that are designed to the same specifications.
          Unfortunately, the systems used by most governmental agencies are neither
          interoperable nor integrated.
            The FBI maintains records that adhere to the “gold standard” of ten rolled
          finger images (see Fig. 6.1). These nail-to-nail images, whether taken with ink
          or electronically, capture as much image detail as possible. They are used not
          only for tenprint identification purposes, but are also invaluable for latent print
          searches. They constitute a complete capture of the finger image surfaces.
            The DHS adopted the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service iden-
          tification system, the Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT).
          IDENT is a two-finger system that allows agents to search the database in a few
          minutes, a much shorter time than the 2 hours required for an IAFIS search.
          While it is unreasonable to detain every person for 2 hours at the border while
          awaiting a background check, is it equally unreasonable to not press for an inte-
          grated system that can produce background information on a person in just a
          few minutes?
            To reduce the time for checking the IAFIS database, an IDENT/IAFIS
          Integration Project was established to allow agents to submit all ten tenprint
          images to IAFIS and receive a response and rap sheet within 10 minutes.
          The faster response is possible due to a “lights out” search technique, in
          which the identification is based entirely on matching scores without human
          verification.
            In June 2003, DHS Secretary Tom Ridge announced that the new “US-VISIT”
          (United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology) would
          replace an earlier Department of Justice program, the National Security Entry
          Exit System (NSEERS). This program requires that non-immigrant aliens from
          certain foreign countries be fingerprinted and photographed at the ports of
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145