Page 192 - Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS)
P. 192

STANDARDS AND INTEROPERABILITY        177



          elimination prints is no less than the expertise required to make any latent print
          identification.
            In Figure 8.2, the effect of taking elimination prints is highlighted. Agency
          A takes elimination prints at the crime scene, but Agency B does not. When the
          technicians from Agency A return to headquarters, they make a manual com-
          parison of the 80 prints they have taken with the elimination prints. They make
          20 identifications without the use of the AFIS system. They close two cases with
          these identifications, i.e., in two of the ten cases, the only latent prints found
          at the crime scene were identified as belonging to persons who had a legitimate
          reason for being there. Of the original 100 images the technicians examined
          at ten crime scenes, 20 were determined to be of no value. Assume these 20
          represented all the images in two cases. The elimination prints identified
          another 20 latents and closed two additional cases from further latent print
          searches. At this point, the team from Agency A has 60 latent images remain-
          ing from six cases. The technicians at Agency B did not take elimination prints
          from anyone present at the crime scene. They still have 100 latent prints taken
          from ten crime scenes.
            If asked for a statistical report at this time, the staff at Agency A could report
          that they made identifications on 20 out of 80 latent prints (100 images minus
          20 images of no value) in eight cases, a hit rate of 25% before any AFIS searches.
          Agency B has 100 latent images, value undetermined, and has not taken any
          elimination prints. Their hit rate for 100 images thus far is zero.
            As illustrated in Figure 8.3, when the teams from the two agencies return to
          their headquarters, each team has a different number of images from the crime
          scene to search. The team from Agency A has 60 images, while the team from
          Agency B has 100. With the computer imaging equipment available, the team
          from Agency A determines that only 50 of the 60 latent images are of value;
          similarly, Agency B eliminates 30 of the 100 latent images, leaving 70 latent
          images for them to search.


                                                                                  Figure 8.2
                                        Elimination
                                          Prints                                  Use of Elimination Prints

                    Agency A                                Agency B
                 Manual
                 comparisons    Yes      Taken at  No      All 100 prints may
                 identify 20 prints       scene?           be searched on
                 6 cases                                   AFIS, 10 cases


                Elimination prints identify 20         No elimination prints taken
                60 lifts remain                        100 lifts remain
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197