Page 118 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 118

Conglomerat on and Med a Monopol es  | 

                 1989; Schiller, Herbert. Communication and Cultural Domination. White Plains, NY:
                 International Arts and Science Press, 1976; Schiller, Herbert. Living in the Number One
                 Country. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2000; Thussu, Daya Kishan. International Com-
                 munication: Continuity and Change. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

                                                                    Victor W. Pickard


              CongloMeration and Media MonoPolies

                Conglomeration poses a range of issues for citizens and consumers. Does the
              presence of prominent news outlets in multinational conglomerates influence
              the coverage of contentious social and political issues? What effect does indus-
              try concentration have on media content—motion pictures, television programs,
              music, and so on? Does the loss of diversity in ownership result in the replica-
              tion of money-making formulas that promote a corporate ethos at the expense of
              original ideas? Overall, does consolidation make it impossible or at least improb-
              able for independent voices and viewpoints to reach citizens and consumers?
              These are just a few of the questions that surround the ownership controversy.
                The focal point in the battle over media conglomeration is the concentration
              of prominent news and entertainment firms in a handful of corporations. Free
              market advocates argue that centralized ownership is necessary if companies are
              to remain profitable. They point to the explosion in the number of programming
              outlets, arguing that consolidation has not restricted the variety of media con-
              tent. But opponents contend that conglomeration eliminates alternative view-
              points and empowers corporate media to promote dominant ideas and frame
              public discussion and debate.

                DEFining CongLomEraTion

                Conglomeration is the process through which distinct companies come under
              common ownership within a single corporation. There are two different models
              of conglomeration, and prominent media firms fall within each of them. The
              traditional definition of conglomeration involves the grouping of wide-ranging,
              unrelated businesses from various industrial sectors. This model involves unre-
              lated diversification, which is the expansion into industries that are not related
              to the core business of a conglomerate. The General Electric acquisition of NBC
              in 1986 is a classic example of that type. A second model of conglomeration
              builds through related diversification, which involves the acquisition of firms
              that are connected to the core business in critical areas. The evolution of Viacom
              is an example of that form. Cable television was its core business in the 1980s,
              with ownership of MTV, Nickelodeon, and Showtime, before it expanded into
              motion pictures and broadcast television with the acquisitions of Paramount
              Pictures in 1994 and CBS in 2000.


                monoPoLiEs
                Conglomeration is one factor that leads to concentration, and ultimate con-
              solidation results in monopolies. That structure exists when there is just a single
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123