Page 20 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 20

Introduct on  |   i

              allow issues to go unnoticed, thereby avoiding needed public debate. The Video
              News Release, for example, may not be a household phrase, but we argue that it
              should be; similarly, other entries examine noncorporate media. Since the media
              industry enjoys such a considerable monopoly on many citizens’ attention, ev-
              eryday discussions are often informed and framed by the news and entertain-
              ment content brought to their attention by media companies. In this collection,
              we hope not only to examine the agendas set by mainstream media, but also
              to unearth hot-button issues that corporate media do not discuss with enough
              frequency. In addition, considering the aesthetic influences, motivations, and
              struggles of alternative media and independent cultural productions, allows us
              to see the dominant media in new and revealing ways. As Marshall McLuhan
              noted, just as fishes do not notice the existence of water till out of it, the media
              flows all around each one of us, our habitat and our lived environment, and thus
              this collection will at times focus on media issues that have become as invisible
              to us as water is to fish.
                While it is common to talk of “the media” as if it were a monolithic entity,
              and while corporate collusion sometimes makes it appear uniform and singular,
              of course there is no such entity called “the media.” Instead, the media is a col-
              lection of programs, films, songs, stars, and games from varying sources, which
              are consumed by varying citizens and consumers, often in varying ways. Media
              are regulated differently and are produced differently. Thus, “the media” is a
              huge amalgam of variation and difference, rendering it hard if not impossible to
              generalize about “the media” as a whole. We intend the entries in these two vol-
              umes to tackle different zones of the media universe, thereby not only present-
              ing disagreements and controversies within any given entry, but also producing
              disagreement between different entries. With audiences, programs, producers,
              regulators, citizens, artists, and institutions all active agents in the production
              of “the media,” one will find a different picture of the media universe depending
              upon which agent(s) one focuses on, as will be evident across the many entries
              in these two volumes.
                Each entry includes an opening that explains a key controversy or battle-
              ground  topic,  the  entry  proper,  and  a  list  of  further  readings.  The  latter,  in
              conjunction with the general bibliography at the end of Volume 2, should help
              readers find more discussion of the issue at hand. We also encourage readers
              to follow the cross-references throughout, as inevitably many issues build on
              the shoulders of others, and some entries are illuminated further by yet other
              entries. The cross-references should offer readers an Ariadne’s thread through
              the collection.
                Finally, as editors, we must offer thanks to the many individuals who have
              helped us put this collection together, namely our fantastic contributors and
              Daniel Harmon at Greenwood Press. We would also like to thank Guy Robinson
              and Monica Grant for assistance and support: juggling so many entries taxes the
              brain, and we thank them for helping us to keep our gray matter in order.

                                         Robin Andersen and Jonathan Gray, August 2007
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25