Page 446 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 446

Real ty Telev s on  | 

              see also Cable Carriage Disputes; Hypercommercialism; Innovation and Imita-
              tion in Commercial Media; Media Reform; Minority Media Ownership; Net
              Neutrality;  Online  Digital  Film  and  Television;  Public  Opinion;  Represen-
              tations  of  Race;  Representations  of  Women;  Sensationalism,  Fear  Monger-
              ing,  and  Tabloid  Media;  Shock  Jocks;  Transmedia  Storytelling  and  Media
              Franchises.
              Further  reading:  Ang,  Ien.  Desperately  Seeking  the  Audience.  New  York:  Routledge,
                 1991; Bates, James, and Matthew James. “Political Opposites Costar in a TV Ratings
                 Drama; Murdoch’s News Corp. and a Minority Coalition Seek to Delay New System
                 for Counting Viewers.” Los Angeles Times, June 3, 2004, A1; Bermejo, Fernando. The
                 Internet Audience: Constitution and Measurement. New York: Peter Lang, 2007; Bianco,
                 Anthony,  and  Ronald  Grover.  “How  Nielsen  Stood  up  to  Murdoch.”  Business  Week,
                 September 20, 2004, 88; Buzzard, Karen S. Chains of Gold: Marketing the Ratings and Rat-
                 ing the Market. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1990; Napoli, Philip M. Audience Economics:
                 Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press,
                 2003; Webster, James G., Patricia F. Phalen, and Lawrence W. Lichty. Ratings Analysis:
                 The Theory and Practice of Audience Research, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
                 Associations, 2005.
                                                                     Philip M. Napoli



              reality teleVision
                From  the  evolving  Survivor  series  to  Queer  Eye  for  the  Straight  Guy,  the
              phenomenon known as reality TV has transformed the face of television and
              changed the way programs are produced, distributed, and consumed. For more
              than a decade, reality TV has exerted considerable influence on media econom-
              ics, program aesthetics, and industry practices, and raised critical issues for par-
              ticipants and viewers alike. Reality TV has become a battleground for media
              observers and critics, who charge that these popular programs expose private
              spaces, encourage voyeurism, and claim that entertainment is reality in competi-
              tions that often lead to ridicule and humiliation.
                Reality television is simultaneously a genre, a format, a technological form, a
              series of experiments, a celebrity-making machine, an interactive aesthetic, and
              a political ideology. While its history is contested and its boundaries are fuzzy,
              reality TV is without doubt one of the most significant developments in twenty-
              first-century media.


                PrEDECEssors
                Many of the characteristics found in reality TV can be found in TV programs
              from decades ago. Bringing cameras into people’s everyday lives as entertain-
              ment can be traced back to shows like Queen for a Day and This Is Your Life
              in the 1950s. This attention to “ordinary people” could later be found in Real
              People and That’s Incredible!, shows that highlighted unusual abilities. Daytime
              talk shows continued this focus on everyday lives, as well as featuring “make-
              over” segments (central to later reality TV). America’s Funniest Home Videos and
   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451