Page 462 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 462

Representat ons of Class  |    1

                 Thomas. Selling the Air: A Critique of the Policy of Commercial Broadcasting in the
                 United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
                                                                     Allison Perlman


              rePresentations oF Class

                U.S.  media  simultaneously  ignore  class-based  inequalities  and  convey  the
              mythical idea that anyone can rise above their socioeconomic origins if they just
              work hard enough. While representations of class are not as controversial as the
              media’s treatment of gender and race, they are no less important as cultural indi-
              cators of unequal power relations.
                Did you ever notice how many doctors, lawyers, and business executives pop-
              ulate the fictional and nonfictional worlds of U.S. television? Like other forms of
              commercial media, TV dramatically overrepresents the lives—and lifestyles—of
              well-educated, upper-income professionals. As social critic Barbara Ehrenreich
              points out, about 70 percent of people in the United States can be considered
              “working class,” in that they perform monotonous (and often low-paid) forms
              of manual and service work, labor for wages instead of salaries, and often do
              not have college degrees (Ehrenreich 1998). Yet, we rarely see their experiences
              on the job, in the community, or at home reflected on the screen. As numerous
              media scholars have shown, when working-class people do appear in the media,
              they are often shown to be pursuing the American dream of upward mobility—
              or else they are often blamed for failing to “pull themselves up by the bootstraps.”
              Given the stigma ascribed to working-class people by mediated images and dis-
              courses, it is not surprising that most Americans reject that label. According to



              titanic
              The 1997 blockbuster Titanic reworked the cross-class romance narrative—a staple of Holly-
              wood film—at a moment of growing class polarization. In the midst of corporate downsizing,
              cuts to social welfare programs, and looming economic recession, the film offered a feel-good
              story about a poor artist who is traveling in steerage and a pampered socialite who is traveling
              first-class. Defying the steep social hierarchy inherent to the two-tier spatial organization of
              the ship, Jack and Rose fall in love and eventually come to reject the European-coded class
              hierarchies of the “bygone” era depicted by the film. Celebrating Rose’s voluntary downward
              mobility and situating vivid social and economic inequalities squarely in the past, Titanic re-
              affirmed the American dream of classlessness at a moment of impending doubt about the
              future of the middle class. Filmed in Mexico to exploit the cheap labor of “runaway” movie
              production, the film offered a quintessentially American fantasy in which the structural in-
              equalities of the global capitalist order can be overcome by the choices of plucky individuals.


                See  Laurie  Ouellette,  “Ship  of  Dreams:  Cross  Class  Romance  and  the  Cultural  Fantasy  of  Titanic,”
              in Titanic: Anatomy of a Blockbuster, eds. Gaylyn Studlar and Kevin Sandler (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
              University Press, 2002).
   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467