Page 575 - Battleground  The Media Volume 1 and 2
        P. 575
       |  V olence and Med a: From Med a Effects to Moral Pan cs
                       parodies, imitations, and other forms of meaning-making, indicates that hu-
                       mans are active producers often at odds with commercial producers.
                          moraL PaniCs anD moraL EnTrEPrEnEurs
                          The persistence of such controversy around media effects research may be un-
                       derstood as a deeper crisis in how we think of children, technology, and threats
                       in the modern world. These periodic concerns expressed as anxiety over “media
                       violence” are given the term moral panics.
                          Moral panics are public campaigns that often call for censorship or express
                       outrage at behavior or fantasies of particular lower-status social groups when
                       those same groups are perceived as escaping the control of the dominant sta-
                       tus group. They occur often during periods of social and technological change
                       and may crystallize around a particular emotional issue. The early Salem witch
                       burnings were facilitated by the panic induced by male clergy members who felt
                       threatened by the increasing power of women in the church. Closer to our time
                       period, concerns over comic books, pool hall attendance, heavy metal and rap
                       music, television violence and sex, films, and a host of media activities have come
                       under public scrutiny for their supposed corruption of morals and youth. In the
                       1980s, the Parents Music Resource Center went after heavy metal bands for their
                       supposed effect on youth and the belief that such music “caused” teenage sui-
                       cides. Today, it is conservative groups like Focus on the Family attacking Barbie
                       dolls and Teletubbies or the Parents Television Council decrying acts of televi-
                       sion violence and gore, while liberal groups attack the computer games Manhunt
                       and Grand Theft Auto for their racial and gender stereotypes and simulated sex
                       in hidden codes. While racists and sexist attitudes persist in our society, the de-
                       gree to which media cause those attitudes has yet to be demonstrated by effects
                       research, and media and First Amendment scholars argue that the values of an
                Moral entrePreneurs and Media ConsuMPtion
                Originally coined by the sociologist Howard Becker in his 1963 work, Outsiders: Studies in
                the Sociology of Deviance, moral entrepreneurs work as crusading reformers attempting to
                clean up what they perceive as the failure of lower-status groups. With humanitarian intents,
                such groups and individuals often work in a paternalist fashion to shape the behavior of those
                in social classes below them, usually taking on and being offended by the representations of
                working- or lower-class culture. Moral entrepreneurs work to mobilize social groups and the
                public at large against what they perceive as threats to the dominant social order, helping to
                define what is considered deviant behavior. The use of labeling and stereotyping often op-
                erates in constructing definitions of what is deviant. These labels are, in turn, used by moral
                entrepreneurs to support their actions against the offending representations. For example,
                by invoking moral outrage against rock music, the Parents Music Resource Center signaled
                to concerned parents that they shared their values and concerns. This solidarity is, in turn,
                cemented by creating an “out” group, while reinforcing the prejudices of the “in” group.
