Page 66 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 66

Blogosphere: Pol t cs and Internet Journal sm  | 

                 2000; Lovell, Terry. Pictures of Reality: Aesthetics, Politics and Pleasure. London: British
                 Film Institute, 1980; Lynch, Jake, and McGoldrick, Annabel. Peace Journalism. Stroud,
                 United Kingdom: Hawthorn, 2005; McChesney, Robert. The Problem of the Media. New
                 York: Monthly Review Press, 2004; McQuail, Denis. Media Performance: Mass Com-
                 munication and the Public Interest. London: Sage, 1992; Norris, Christopher. Uncritical
                 Theory: Postmodernism, Intellectuals and the Gulf War. London: Lawrence and Wishart,
                 1992; Schiller, Dan. Objectivity and the News. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylva-
                 nia Press, 1981; Schudson, Michael. Discovering the News: A Social History of Ameri-
                 can Newspapers. New York: Basic Books, 1978; Stephens, Mitchell. A History of News:
                 From the Drum to the Satellite. New York: Penguin, 1988; Tuchman, Gaye. “Objectivity
                 as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity.” American
                 Journal of Sociology, 77 (1972): 660–79.

                                                                    Robert A. Hackett


              BlogosPhere: PolitiCs and internet JournalisM

                Today’s blogs reflect a style of politics and the press that was a major force in
              American society almost to the time of the Civil War. At the same time, they are
              showing how quickly and effectively new technologies can be used to affect con-
              temporary affairs. Certainly, since the start of the 2004 presidential campaign,
              the blogs have become an increasingly important part of the American political
              landscape.


                BaCkgrounD

                Over the last quarter of the twentieth century, both news media and political
              organizations in America became more and more centralized, the former to the
              point where they were associated almost exclusively with New York City, the lat-
              ter with Washington, DC. Technological innovations, particularly in the area of
              communications, made it more financially attractive to consolidate ownership
              of news media operations and allowed political leaders to remain in close touch
              with supporters a long distance away. Though more efficient, these changes also
              led to increased alienation from both news media and politics on the part of the
              average American.
                At the same time, the debates of the nation began to be used by the news
              media for ratings. No longer were they as interested in the quest for solution.
              Both  politicians  and  the  news  media  participated  in  this,  the  politicians  to
              stake out a definable public image and the news media defining the debates as
              entertainment, looking for continued conflict (and, therefore, continued view-
              ership) instead of progress toward resolution. Much of this left the public de-
              cidedly cold.
                When the blogs appeared, they provided a link back to another era of Ameri-
              can politics and journalism, a time of direct popular participation in both, but
              one that began to disappear as the Civil War approached. In the early years of
              the American republic, newspaper editors were directly involved in the politi-
              cal process. In fact, their newspapers were the networks that allowed for the
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71