Page 107 - Berkshire Encyclopedia Of World History Vol I - Abraham to Coal
P. 107

this fleeting world / our world: the modern era tfw-47



                                                    I am inclined to think that history pays its way largely in the personal
                                                  satisfaction of sitting on the fence and enjoying vicariously the trials and
                                           tribulations of men and times now ended. • AVERY O. CRAVEN (1885–1980)



            was one of the few traditional societies that managed to  from protected markets.The burst of imperialism during
            make a transition to a modern industrial economy with-  the late nineteenth century was the most obvious expres-
            out destroying the fabric of its society.           sion of this rivalry; another was the spread of protection-
              By 1900 many features of the modern revolution were  ism (protection of domestic producers through restrictions
            apparent throughout the North  Atlantic core region,  on foreign competitors),and a third was the emergence of
            and, for better or worse, many other parts of the world  a system of defensive alliances in Europe, which helped
            were also beginning to feel its impact on lifeways,  turn a crisis in the Balkans into a global war.Distrust and
            economies, governments, and ways of thinking.       rivalry among the major industrial powers clogged the
                                                                arteries of international exchange that were so crucial as
            Twentieth-Century                                   a source of economic growth and political stability.
            Crisis: 1914–1945                                     After the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand,
            Between 1913 and 1950 the engine of growth that had  the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian empire, on
            transformed so much of the world seemed to break    28 June 1914,Austria invaded Serbia, Russia intervened
            down. Global rates of growth of GDP slowed from 1.30  to defend Serbia, and Germany declared war on Russia,
            percent per annum between 1870 and 1913 to 0.91 per-  which dragged Russia’s allies, Britain and France, into the
            cent between 1913 and 1950.The slowdown affected all  war. The global reach of European colonial and com-
            the core regions of the Industrial Revolution but was  mercial networks dragged other regions into the war. Ger-
            even more pronounced in the former agrarian colossi,  man colonies in  Africa, the Pacific, and China were
            China and India.The apparent exception to the rule was  seized by French, British, and Japanese armies; troops
            Russia, whose annual growth rate rose from 1.06 percent  and supplies came to Europe from present and former
            during the late czarist period to 1.76 percent between  colonies in India, southeastern Asia, Africa, Australasia,
            1913 and 1950.                                      and North America as well as from semicolonies such as
              The slowdown was caused in part by a breakdown in  Argentina. In 1917 the United States entered the war
            the international banking and trading systems that had  against Germany.
            helped spread the Industrial Revolution. Between 1870  Nineteenth-century military innovations ensured that
            and 1950 the proportion of world production that was  World War I would be particularly bloody. New weapons
            traded internationally actually fell. Part of the problem  included machine guns, tanks, airplanes, and chemical
            was that the governments of industrializing countries  weapons such as mustard gas, which could burn out the
            were still learning how best to manage rapid economic  internal organs of its victims. Ironically, medical improve-
            growth, and all too often, like the great agrarian empires  ments kept more troops at the front, only to be slaugh-
            of the past, they treated growth as a zero-sum game (a sit-  tered in the thousands by machine guns or artillery in
            uation in which a gain for one side entails a loss for the  often futile raids on enemy positions. Modern industrial
            other side) that could be won only by excluding rivals  states mobilized for “total war” effectively as they took
                                                                control of national economies to supply their armies.The
            For more on these topics, please see the following articles:
                                                                home fronts—where women replaced men on the farms,
            Colonialism p. 381 (v2)
                                                                in munitions factories, or on the railways—were as vital
            Communism and Socialism p. 401 (v2)
                                                                to success as the armies. Indeed, the role of women dur-
            Fascism p. 733 (v2)
                                                                ing World War I was a major factor in the rapid spread
            Genocide p. 815 (v2)
                                                                of women’s suffrage during the postwar years.World War
            World War I p. 2079 (v5)
                                                                I was not the first total war of the industrial era—the U.S.
            World War II p. 2085 (v5)
                                                                Civil War deserves that title more—but it demonstrated
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112